Journal of Family & Community Medicine
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 

Users Online: 998 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


Year : 2010  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 87-90 Table of Contents     

The relation of age to the severity of Type I diabetes in children

College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication23-Oct-2010

Correspondence Address:
Suliman H Al-Fifi
College of Medicine, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 641, Abha 61421
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1319-1683.71990

Rights and Permissions

Objective: To study the relationship between the age and severity of Type 1 diabetes in children 0 - 5 years and more than 5 years of age admitted to Aseer Central Hospital, Southwestern Saudi Arabia over a 7-year period. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of children less than 13 years of age with Type 1 diabetes admitted to the Pediatric Department, between 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2006. Results: A total of 181 children with Type1 diabetes were admitted to the hospital during this period. Of these, 27.6% were children 5 years or less, while 72.4% were more than 5 years of age. The duration of symptoms was longer in younger children compared to older patients. Diabetic ketoacidosis was present in 31.4% of the younger children, and in 15.3% of the children more than 5 years old. Hospital stay was also longer in children less than 5 years of age. Most significant differences were in the younger children's group and affected the biochemical test results. Conclusion: The present study showed that more younger children present to the hospital late, and in a state of diabetic ketoacidosis compared to older patients. Efforts should be directed at improving the knowledge and skills of the primary health care personnel to be able to diagnose and refer these cases earlier.

Keywords: Type 1 diabetes, children, severity, biochemical, laboratory

How to cite this article:
Al-Fifi SH. The relation of age to the severity of Type I diabetes in children. J Fam Community Med 2010;17:87-90

How to cite this URL:
Al-Fifi SH. The relation of age to the severity of Type I diabetes in children. J Fam Community Med [serial online] 2010 [cited 2021 Dec 2];17:87-90. Available from:

   Introduction Top

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in children. It is caused by absolute insulin deficiency following the destruction of the insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells. Most commonly, it presents in childhood, but one-fourth of all cases are diagnosed in adults. Type 1 diabetes accounts for approximately two-thirds of the newly diagnosed cases in patients 19 years of age. [1],[2],[3]

Type 1diabetes has a bimodal distribution with one peak at 4 to 6 years of age and a second at early puberty (10 to 14 years of age). [4],[5],[6]

The period between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis of the disease is variable. This can be as long as a few weeks to months when the level of education of the family is low or health facilities are inadequate. When there is a family history of Type1diabetes, this period can be as Short as a few days if the parents are very observant. The other important factor is the age of the patient. Younger children are likely to present with vague symptoms such as apathy, irritability, restlessness while older children usually present with the classical symptoms of polyuria, polydipsia and weight loss. The diagnosis in girls is also likely to be more delayed than boys for no clear reason. [7],[8]

Younger children are also likely to present critically ill and this is reflected by the higher rates of diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA) in them compared to older children. A more severe degree of dehydration is also encountered in this age group . This is because they have a higher rate of respiratory and gastrointestinal infections which may delay the diagnosis. In these children the metabolic derangements may also take longer to correct. [8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]

The prevalence of DKA decreased with age from 37.3% in children aged 0 to 4 years to 14.7% in those aged 15 to 19 years. [15]

The frequency of DKA at the onset of the disease correlates inversely with the incidence of Type 1 diabetes and is more common if there is negative family history, poor socioeconomic conditions, less desirable health insurance coverage, and lower parental education. [10] In a local study done in the northwest of Saudi Arabia, DKA was diagnosed in 55.3% at the onset of the disease and girls were found to present in DKA more frequently than boys, with a ratio of 1.4:1. [16]

This study was conducted to compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics of diabetic children of two different age groups admitted to our hospital with a special interest in their presentation and their hospital course.

   Materials and Methods Top

All children aged 0-13 years of age with Type 1 diabetes admitted to the pediatric department of Aseer Central hospital, Southwestern Saudi Arabia, from 1 st January 2000 to 31 st December 2006 were included in the study. Any patient older than 13 years of age or admitted for any reason other than diabetes was excluded.

Their files were analyzed to collect the following data: name, age, sex, file number, clinical presentation at the time of admission to the pediatric ward or to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Height, weight, and weight loss were determined. The mental status was registered as affected or not as well as their initial biochemical tests results. A child with diabetic ketoacidosis was defined as any child presenting with pH < 7.3, bicarbonate < 15 and the presence of urinary ketones. The duration of hospitalization was also noted.

The study was approved by the chairman of the research committee at our institution. Aseer central hospital is the only tertiary hospital in the region which receives all the complicated cases diagnosed at the primary health care centers and other secondary hospitals.

Statistical analysis

The collected data were then categorized into those children 0-5 years of age and of children more than 5 years age. Statistical analysis was then undertaken to compare the two groups using two tailed Student's t test and Chi square tests wherever indicated with significance level at P <0.05.

   Results Top

[Table 1] describes the comparison of the clinical presentation of the two groups of children. It shows that the mean age of the older group was 9.6 ± 1.7 years while the mean age for the younger children was 2.3 ± 1.3 years. The duration of symptoms before admission was significantly longer (19. 3 ± 10.1 days) in the younger children than in the older children (7.8 ± 13.3 days). Moreover, the younger children also had a significantly longer hospital stay (8.2 ± 9.5 days) compared to 4.6 ± 3.5 days for the older group. There was also differences in the clinical picture at the time of admission between the two groups. Thus, a significantly higher percentage of the younger children presented with accompanying upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) and dehydration (30% and 72% versus 10.7% and 47.3% respectively). However, abdominal pain was significantly more frequent in the older children than the younger children (61.1% versus 26%). A significantly higher percentage of the younger children (31.4%) than the older group (15.3%) had ketosis and ketone bodies in their urine at the time of admission (31.4%).
Table 1: Clinical presentation of both groups of children at the time of admission

Click here to view

[Table 2] depicts the comparison of biochemical tests results between the two groups of children. It shows that, although the random blood sugar RBS was not significantly different between both groups, the HbA1c was significantly lower in the younger group of children with a mean of 8.8% ± 2.6% compared to 11.2 % ± 2.2% for the older group.
Table 2: Comparison of biochemical tests results between both groups of children at the time of admission

Click here to view

The blood pH was significantly more acidic in the younger children (7.2 ± 0.11) compared to 7.3 ± 0.15 in the older children. Consequently, the ABE was significantly higher in the younger children (-13.9 ± 7.3) compared to (-9.8 ± 6.4) in older patients. The level of serum bicarbonate was a significantly lower in the younger children.

   Discussion Top

With the improvement in medical care, Type 1 diabetes can be easily recognized if it is considered by the physician during the assessment of a sick child. The availability of biochemical testing will help the primary care provider to determine the severity of the disease and direct the management of the patient. However, since very young child do not always show clear symptoms, more time has to be be spent to elicit the important information from parents or caregivers. This approach will help to make the diagnosis before any serious metabolic derangements take place.

Previous studies from different areas of Saudi Arabia reported higher rates of DKA at the onset of the disease ranging from 55-77% compared to our study (46.7%). [16]

The lower rates of DKA noticed in the current study compared to the previous reports may be due to better awareness of the disease by the community and easy access to health care.

In the present study, it was found that younger children presented later to the hospital than older children. This might be due to the absence - in most cases - of the classical symptoms of polyuria, polydipsia and weight loss noticeable in older children. Moreover, abdominal pain was less apparent in young children than older ones. This delay contributed to the severity of the disease in this group as shown by the higher frequency of DKA compared to older children (31.4% compared to 15.3) respectively.

It is to be noted here that, despite presenting a more severe disease the younger children had a significantly lower HbA1c% denoting a shorter period of uncontrolled glycemia, compared to the older children, thus compounding the insidious onset of DKA in younger children

It is well known that T1DM in children, often presents with ketosis as the metabolic changes are rapid in this type of diabetes. [17] In the present study, almost a third (31.4%) of the younger patients presented with ketosis, which was double that of the older children (15.3%).

The lack of awareness of the parents as well as the nonspecific early signs and symptoms might be responsible for this discrepancy between the two groups. [7],[8] The longer duration of signs and symptoms as well as the profound metabolic disturbances, and the rapid loss of more fluid by young children resulted in the significantly higher number of young children who showed signs of dehydration and ketoacidosis. [18]

URT infections are known to be one of the triggers of ketoacidosis in diabetic patients. [19] It was a significant presenting finding in the younger children compared to the older group in our study. This might sometimes mask and delay the diagnosis especially at primary health care centers . The biochemical test results show that the older children had a significantly higher RBS. However, both figures, in fact, are so high that the difference between them is of little consequence even if statistically significant.

It has been also noted that with the onset of dehydration in diabetic children, the glumerular filtration rate (GFR) decreases resulting in decreased clearance of glucose and ketones from the circulation. This increases the likelihood of DKA. [20] The acidosis, however, as witnessed by the significantly lower pH and higher ABE in the young children especially when compounded by a significantly higher degree of dehydration carries a special risk of serious complications.


Although this study has a limitation of not including all cases in the region, as some were treated in other institutions, it can be considered an indicator of the clinical picture of children affected with T1DM.

Early recognition of the condition in young children should be sought by improving the awareness of the community as well as the primary care physicians to the possibility of T1DM in the high risk group especially after prolonged vague symptoms of infection. For known diabetics, an early biochemical testing might be of help towards early diagnosis.

   References Top

1.Lipton RB, Drum M, Burnet D, Rich B, Cooper A, Baumann E, et al. Obesity at the onset of diabetes in an ethnically diverse population of children: what does it mean for epidemiologists and clinicians? Pediatrics 2005;115:553-60.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Fagot-Campagna A, Pettitt DJ, Engelgau MM, Burrows NR, Geiss LS, Valdez R, et al. Type 2 diabetes among North American children and adolescents: an epidemiologic review and a public health perspective. J Pediatr 2000;136:664-72.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Duncan GE. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose levels among US adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:523-7.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Felner EI, Klitz W, Ham M, Lazaro AM, Stastny P, Dupont B, White PC. Genetic interaction among three genomic regions creates distinct contributions to early- and late-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes 2005;6:213-20.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Al-Herbish AS, El-Mouzan MI, Al-Sallum AA, Al-Qurashim MM, Al-Omar AA. Prevalence of type 1 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia children and adolescents. Saudi Med J 2008;29:1480-3.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Abdallah MA. Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus among arab children. Saudi Med J 2005;26:911-7.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Hodgson B MI, Ossa A JC, Velasco FN, Urrejola NP, Arteaga LIA. Clinical picture at the onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children. Rev Med Chil 2006;134:1535-40.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Nimri R, Phillip M, Shalitin S. Children diagnosed with diabetes during infancy have unique clinical characteristics. Horm Res 2007;67:263-7.   Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Quinn M, Fleischman A, Rosner B, Nigrin DJ, Wolfsdorf JI. Characteristics at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children younger than 6 years. J Pediatr 2006;148:366-71.none   Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.Rewers A, Klingensmith G, Davis C, Petitti DB, Pihoker C, Rodriguez B. Presence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in youth: the Search for Diabetes in Youth Study. Pediatrics 2008;121:1258-66.  Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Hathout E, Hartwick N, Fagoaga OR, Colacino AR, Sharkey J, Racine M, et al. Clinical, autoimmune, and HLA characteristics of children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes before 5 years of age. Pediatrics 2003;111:860-3.  Back to cited text no. 11      
12.Glaser N, Barnett P, McCaslin I, Nelson D, Trainor J, Louie J, et al. Risk factors for cerebral edema in children with diabetic ketoacidosis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:264-9.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
13.Neu A, Willasch A, Ehehalt S, Hub R, Ranke MB. Ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children: frequency and clinical presentation. Pediatr Diabetes 2003;4:77-81.  Back to cited text no. 13      
14.Gutierrez JA, Bagatell R, Samson MP, Theodorou AA, Berg RA. Femoral central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis in children with diabetic ketoacidosis. Crit Care Med 2003;31:80-3.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
15.Ganesh R, Suresh N, Ramesh J. Diabetic ketoacidosis in children. Natl Med J India 2006;19:155-8.  Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]    
16.Habib HS. Frequency and clinical characteristics of ketoacidosis at onset of childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus in Northwest Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2005;26:1936-9.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]    
17.Cooke DW, Plotuich L. Management of diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents. Pediatr Rev 2008;20:431-5.  Back to cited text no. 17      
18.Toledo JD, Modesto V, Peinador M, Alvarez P, Lopez-Prats JL, Sanchis R, et al. Sodium concentration in rehydration fluids for children with ketoacidotic diabetes: Effect on serum sodium concentration. J Pediatr 2009;154;895-900.  Back to cited text no. 18      
19.Umpierrez GE, Kitabchi AE. Diabetic ketoacidosis: risk factors and management strategies Treat Endocrinol 2003;2:95-108.  Back to cited text no. 19      
20.Fagan MJ, Avner J, Khine H. Initial fluid resuscitation for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: How dry are they? Clin Pediatr 2008;47:851-5.  Back to cited text no. 20      


  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 High Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Type I Diabetic Patients
Qasem Asgari,Mohammad Hossein Motazedian,Amir Khazanchin,Davood Mehrabani,Shahrbanou Naderi Shahabadi,Hassen Mamo
Journal of Parasitology Research. 2021; 2021: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Estrogen, estrogen-like molecules and autoimmune diseases
Judith Merrheim,José Villegas,Jérôme Van Wassenhove,Rémi Khansa,Sonia Berrih-Aknin,Rozen le Panse,Nadine Dragin
Autoimmunity Reviews. 2020; : 102468
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
Bindu Krishnan Padma,Deepa Kunju Krishnan
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2019; 8(25): 1998
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Memory T Cells in Type 1 Diabetes: the Devil is in the Detail
Aditi Narsale,Joanna D. Davies
Current Diabetes Reports. 2017; 17(8)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Both spontaneousIns2+/-and streptozotocin-induced type I diabetes cause bone loss in young mice
Lindsay M. Coe,Jing Zhang,Laura R. McCabe
Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2013; 228(4): 689
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Materials and Me...
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded687    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal

Advertise | Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Disclaimer
© Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 05th September, 2010