Journal of Family & Community Medicine
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 
 

Users Online: 160 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

 

 Table of Contents 
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 1997  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 33-40  

Current trends in laparoscopic cholecystectomy


Department of Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication31-Jul-2012

Correspondence Address:
Abdulmohsen A Al-Mulhim
P.O. Box 1917, Al-Khobar 31952
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 23008571

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Gallstone disease is still a major health problem worldwide. Open cholecystectomy was the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones for more than 100 years. The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the late 1980s has led to dramatic changes in the management of gallstone disease. The aim of this review is to equip the general practitioner with the answers to questions a patient may ask about the current management of gallstones.

Keywords: Laparoscopy, cholecystectomy


How to cite this article:
Al-Mulhim AA. Current trends in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Fam Community Med 1997;4:33-40

How to cite this URL:
Al-Mulhim AA. Current trends in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Fam Community Med [serial online] 1997 [cited 2020 Dec 1];4:33-40. Available from: https://www.jfcmonline.com/text.asp?1997/4/2/33/98423


   Introduction Top


Gallstone disease continues to be one of the most common digestive disorders worldwide. The prevalence of gallstone formation increases with age. [1] In the past few years, ultrasound data on gallstone prevalence have been reported. [2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] In the United States, the reported incidence of gallstones is approximately 10% to 15%, with another one million new cases diagnosed annually. [9],[10]

Although the actual incidence of gallstones in Saudi Arabia is unknown, open cholecystectomy (OC) was the most common major abdominal procedure performed in the Kingdom. [11] Since it was first successfully performed in 1987, [12] laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has rapidly become the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones. It is already well established in Saudi Arabia. [13],[14]

The major aim of this review is to outline the impact of LC on the management of gallstones, focusing on symptomatology, indications, contraindications, complica­tions, and cost of cholecystectomy.


   Symptomatology Top


The symptoms of gallstone disease overlap with those of several other disorders and are therefore nonspecific. Most patients present with an intermittent right upper abdominal pain that may radiate to different sites, and it usually occurs at midnight. [15],[16],[17] Biliary pain may last from 1 to 24 hours; the average is 1 to 5 hours. [16],[17] Compared with renal colic, the pain is mild and easily relieved by analgesics. [17] It is worthmentioning that the term colic and the classic postprandial association are misnomers. [15],[17]

The clinician's dilemma is occasionally compounded by the coincidental discovery of gallstones in a questionably symptomatic patient or in a persistently symptomatic patient without demonstrable gallstones. Many diagnostic tools have been developed to assist in the decision-making process. However, it cannot be overemphasized that the clinical history is still the most important factor, not tests. [18],[19]


   Historical Perspectives Top


Open cholecystectomy, first performed by Carl Langenbuch in Berlin in July 1882, [20] was the standard surgical treatment for symptomatic gallstones for more than a century. [21] It was second only to cesarean section as the most common major abdominal operation in the Unites States. [9]

The morbidity and the relatively long hospitalization and convalescence period associated with OC have led to several alternative treatments for symptomatic gallstones including stone dissolution, lithotripsy and percutaneous stone removal. [22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30] These non-operative therapeutic options, however, are only proven effective in a small number of patients and leave the gallbladder in situ with 50% to 61% incidence of stone recurrence. [31],[32],[33],[34]


   Laparoscopic Cholecystec-Tomy as The Gold Standard Treatment for Gallstones Top


Laparoscopic cholectystectomy was first performed in Lyon, France in March 1987 by Phillipe Mouret. [12] In the history of surgery, very few operations have changed the thinking and operating habits of surgeons as rapidly and broadly as LC. This technique has rapidly emerged as the gold standard treatment for patients with symptomatic gallstones. [35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41],[42],[43]

Advantages of LC over traditional OC include less postoperative pain, improved cosmetics, shorter hospital stay, rapid return to normal activities and work, and less cost. [10],[37],[39],[41],[43],[44],[45] In 1991, Chesly-Curtis and Russell [34] reviewed the available treatments for gallstones [Table 1]. Within a short period, LC rendered all of these almost obsolete.
Table 1: Therapeutic options for gallstones (after Cheslyn-Curtis and Russell34)

Click here to view



   Indications and Contraindications Top


The indications for LC are similar to those for OC, i.e., symptomatic gallstones. [46]

Most people with gallstones are asymptomatic and remain that way. [47],[48] Less than 5% of the 20 million individuals with gallstones in the United States experience symptoms in any year. [49]-[51] Management of patients with asymptomatic gallstones remains controversial. Earlier studies have concluded that OC is not indicated for such patients. [51],[52],[53],[54],[54] The advent of LC has reopened the debate regarding appropriate clinical strategy in this patient population. Although LC has been performed on patients with asymptomatic gallstones, [55],[56] clinical evidence, however, suggests that prophylactic LC should not be routinely recommended for patients with asymptomatic gallstones. [48]

Initially, conditions such as acute cholecytitis, common bile duct (CBD) stones, cholecystoenteric fistula, previous abdominal surgery, and morbid obesity were believed to be contraindications to LC. [37],[57] With increasing experience, however, difficult operations are being attempted. [58]

Although acute cholecystitis is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality in OC, [59] several reports on successful LC inpatients with acute cholecystitis have been published. [58],[60],[61],[62],[63],[64],[65] In a recent prospective study comparing the outcome of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the frequency of serious complications was highest when patients with acute cholecystitis had the open procedure. [66] Hence, patients with this condition should not be denied the advantages of LC when the necessary experience is available.

Morbid obesity is no longer a contraindication and, indeed, the obese patient does relatively better after laparoscopic than open cholecystectomy. [67],[68]

The detection and treatment of CBD stones, present in 9% to 16% of patients with gallstones, [69] is still controversial. Most surgeons and gastroenterologists use endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreato­graphy to diagnose and remove CBD stones before LC. [40],[70] In a few centers, however, expertise in laparoscopic CBD exploration is available. [69],[71],[72],[73],[74]

In addition, successful laparoscopic resection of a cholecystocolic fistula has been reported. [75]

The current list of contraindications to LC has diminished to two: first, anesthetic risk (although successful LC has been done under epidural anesthesia); [76] and second, gallbladder malignancy. [77]

Recently, the indications have been expanded to include cirrhotic patients with severe bleeding tendency [78] and pregnant patients with symptomatic gallstones. [79],[80]

Most surgeons now, including the author, advocate LC for all patients. [81]


   Results of LC Top


[Table 2] illustrates the conversion rate, overall morbidity, percentage of bile duct injury and mortality rate reported from larger series. [82]-[88]
Table 2: Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Click here to view


Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy

In some cases, cholecystectomy cannot be completed laparoscopically and conversion to OC is necessary. [38],[40],[43],[63],[84],[89],[90] Conversion from LC to OC is neither a failure nor a complication of laparoscopic operation, but an attempt to avoid serious complications, when factors that prevent the completion of LC are identified at the time of operation. [90] Conversion rates vary from 2.9 to 13.9%, with an average of 5%. [37]-[40],[45],[91],[92],[93],[94],[95],[96],[97] Reasons for conversion include unclear anatomy as a result of adhesions or acute inflammation, iatrogenic injuries, and unexpected operative findings. [91]

Morbidity

The morbidity of LC is worthy of comment. Large series have reported an overall low rate of complications compared with OC. [40],[84],[86],[88],[98],[99] Buanes and Mjaland [66] prospectively compared the outcome of open and laparoscopic cholectystectomy and described an overall lower complication rate in the laparoscopic group (9% versus 16%).

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is, however, associated with a significant increase in bile duct injury compared with OC. [40],[84],[86],[88],[99],[100] In addition, bile duct injuries during LC are more severe and difficult to correct than those associated with the open procedure. [88]

Certain complications, which may be lethal, are unique for LC, i.e., visceral and vascular injuries, and gas embolus. [84],[86],[87] Fortunately, these complications are rare provided surgeons are aware of them and take the necessary precautions.

Mortality

Two comprehensive studies, the first including 42,474 patients undergoing OC, [101] the other 77,604 patients operated laparoscopically, [84] reported a 0.17% mortality after the open procedure versus a rate of 0.04% after LC.

Furthermore, recent studies confirmed that LC carries lower mortality rate than the open procedure. [66],[99]

Length of hospital stay and return to normal activity

There is no doubt that a successful LC is associated with minimal trauma than the open procedure, resulting in less postoperative pain, a shorter hospital stay and rapid return to normal activity and work. [39],[40],[41],[102] Hospital stay after LC is 0.89-1.6 days .[87],[103] compared with 6 days after OC. [66] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, indeed, can be safely performed on an outpatient basis in selected patients. [104],[105]

Absence from work is 6-8 weeks after OC, [9],[39] while patients who undergo LC can resume full activity after 7-14 days. [43],[66],[103]

Expense

Controversy still exists regarding the cost of LC. This probably reflects difficulty and differences in calculating the total expenses of the procedure. Several reports, however, have shown lower hospital costs for laparoscopic than for open cholecystectomy. [106],[107],[108],[109] A recent study from Sweden [110] found the hospital costs for OC to be less compared with LC, however, in respect to society, LC was a cost-saving procedure. Several factors are responsible for the differences between these studies including the use of different equipment, i.e., disposable versus reusable, electro­surgery versus laser.


   Conclusion Top


Gallstone disease remains a major health problem worldwide. LC is now the gold standard treatment for patients with symptomatic gallstones. Undoubtedly the greatest advantages for the patient and society from the use of LC are short hospital stay (less than 2 days), and rapid return to normal activity and work (1-2 weeks) compared with 6-8 weeks after OC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is also safer and less costly than the open procedure, with lower morbidity and mortality rates. Conversion from LC to OC is expected in about 5% of the cases. The increased incidence of CBD injury during LC is of concern, however, as surgeons gain more experience in the technique this is expected to decrease.

 
   References Top

1.Bennion LJ, Grundy SM. Risk factors for the development of cholelithiasis in man. N Engl J Med 1979; 299:1221-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Rome Group for Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Prevalence of gallstone disease in an Italian adult female population. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119:796-805.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Jørgensen T. Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126:912-21.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Glambek I, Kvaale G, Arnesjö B, Søreide O. Prevalence of gallstones in a Norwegian population. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987; 22:1089-94.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Nomura H, Kashiwagi S, Hayashi J, Kajiyama W, Ikematsu H, Noguchi A, et al. Prevalence of gallstone disease in a general population of Okinawa, Japan. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128:598-605.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, Zargar SA, Javid G, Sapru S. Prevalence of biliary tract disease in India: a sonographic study in adult population in Kashmir. Gut 1989; 30:201-5.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Maurer KR, Everhart JE, Ezzati TM, Johannes RS, Knowler WC, Larson DL, et al. Prevalence of gallstone disease in Hispanic populations in the United States. Gastroenterology 1989; 96:487-92.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Heaton KW, Braddon FEM, Mountford RA, Hughes AO, Emmett PM. Symptomatic and silent gall stones in the Community, Gut 1991;32:316-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Vital and Health Statistics: Detailed diagnoses and procedures. National Hospital Discharge Survey 1987. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, March 1989, Series 13, No. 100.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.National Institues of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993; 165:390-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Tamimi TM, Wosornu L, Al-Khozaim A, Abdul-Ghani A. Increased cholecystectomy rates in Saudi Arabia. Lancet 1990; 336:1235-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Mouret G. From the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the frontiers of laparoscopic surgery: the future perspectives. Dig Surg 1991; 8:124-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Mofti AB, Hussein NM, Suleiman SI, Ismail SA, Jain GC, Al-Momen AA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first year experience. Ann Saudi Med 1994; 14:33-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14. Meshikhes AN, Al-Dhurais SA, Bhatia D, Al-Khater NS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dammam Central Hospital experience. Int Surg 1995; 80:102-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Gunn A, Keddie N. Some clinical observations on patients with gallstones. Lancet 1972; 2:239-41.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Diehl AK, Sugarek NJ, Todd KH. Clinical evaluation for gallstone disease: usefulness of symptoms and signs in diagnosis. Am J Med 1990; 89:29-33.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Rigas B, Torosis J, McDougall CJ, Vener KJ, Spiro HM. The circadian rhythm of biliary colic. J Clin Gastroenterol 1990; 12:409-14.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Gilliland TM, Traverso LW. Cholecystectomy provides long-term symptom relief in patients with acalculous gallbladders. Am J Surg 1990; 159:489-92.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Gilliland TM, Traverso LW. Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long term relief of symptoms. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170:39-44.   Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Langenbuch C. Ein fall von exstripation der gallenblase wegen chronischer cholelithiasis. Heilung Berl Klin Wochenschr 1882;19:725-7.   Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.McSherry CK. Cholecystectomy: The gold standard. Am J Surg 1989; 158:174-78.   Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Schoenfield LJ, Lachin JM. The Steering Committee, the National Cooperative Gallstone Study Group. Chenodiol (chenodeoxycholic acid) for dissolution of gallstones: The National Cooperative Gallstone Study. Ann Intern Med 1981; 95:257-82.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Sackmann M, Delius M, Sauerbruch T, Holi J, Weber W, Ippisch E, et al. Shock-wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones. The first 175 patients. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:393-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Rosseland AR, Solhaug JH. Primary endoscopic pappilotomy (EPT) in patients with stones in the common bile duct and the gallbladder in situ: A 5-8 year follow-up study. World J Surg 1988; 12:111-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Foerster EC, Schneider MU, Matek W, Domschke W. Endoscopic retrograde catheterization of the gallbladder (ERCG). Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35:164.   Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Griffith DP, Gleeson MJ. Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy: A logical progression of endourologic techniques. J Endourol 1989; 3:11-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Picus D, Weyman PJ, Marx MV. Role of percutaneous intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary tract calculi (Work in Progress). Radiology 1989; 170:989-93.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Thistle JL, May GR, Bender CE, Williams HJ, LeRoy AJ, Nelson PE, et al. Dissolution of cholesterol gallbladder stones by methyl-tert-butyl ether administered by percutaneous transhepatic catheter. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:633-9.   Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Miller FJ, Kensey KR, Nash JE. Experimental percutaneous gallstone lithotripsy: Results in swine. Radiology 1989; 170:985-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Schoenfield LJ, Berci G, Carnovale RL, Casarella W, Caslowitz P, Chumley D, et al. The effect of ursodiol on the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of gallstones. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1239-45.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Thistle JL. Pros and cons of the nonsurgical treatments for gallbladder stones. Hepatogastroenterology 1989; 36:327-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Villanova N, Bazzoli T, Taroni F, Frabboni R, Mazzella G, Festi D, et al. Gallstone recurrence after successful oral bile acid treatment. A 12-year follow-up study and evaluation of long-term postdissolution treatment. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:726-31.   Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Vergunst H, Terpstra OT, Brakel K, Lameris JS, van Blankenstein M, Schroder FH. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones: possibilities and limitations. Ann Surg 1989; 210:565-74.   Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Cheslyn-Curtis S, Russell RCG. New trends in gallstone management. Br J Surg 1991; 78:143-9.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1989; 3:131-3.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Périssat J, Collet D, Belliard R. Gallstones: laparoscopic treatment by intracorporeal lithotripsy followed by cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy. A personal technic. Endoscopy 1989; 21:373-4.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Dubois F, Icard P, Bethelot G, Levard H. Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 1990; 211:60-2.   Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, et al. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 161:385-7.   Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Zucker KA, Bailey RW, Gadacz TR, Imbembo AL. Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 161:36-44.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1073-8.   Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Grace PA, Quereshi A, Coleman J, Keane R, McEntee G, Broe P, Osborne H, Bouchier-Hayes D. Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1991; 78:160-2.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Cooperman AM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an early experience. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86:694-6.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, Ashley SW, Dunnegan DL. Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 174:114-8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Dietrich A, Lefering R. Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 1991; 78:150-4.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.Sanabria J, Clavien PA, Cywes R, Strasberg S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a matched study. Can J Surg 1993; 36:330-6.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.Finlayson NDC. Cholecystectomy for gall stones. BMJ 1989; 298:133-4.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.Jorgensen T. Abdominal symptoms and gallstone disease: an epidemiological investigation. Hepatology 1989; 9:856-60.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.Fendrick AM, Glesson SP, Cabana MD, Schwartz JS. Asymptomatic gallstones revisited. Is There a role for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Arch Fam Med 1993; 2: 959-68.   Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.Gracie WA, Ransohoff DF. The natural history of silent gallstones: the innocent gallstone is not a myth. N Engl J Med 1982; 307:798-800.   Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.Thistle JL, Cleary PA, Lachin JM, Tyor MP, Hersh T. The natural history of cholelithiasis: the National Cooperative Gallstone Study. Ann Intern Med 1984; 101:171-5.   Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.McSherry CK, Ferstenberg H, Calhoun WF, Lahman E, Virshup M. The natural history of diagnosed gallstone disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Ann Surg 1985; 202:59-63.   Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.Friedman GD, Raviola CA, Fireman B. Prognosis of gallstones with mild or no symptoms: 25 years of follow-up in a health maintenance organization. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42:127-36.   Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.Ransohoff DF, Gracie WA, Wolfenson LB, Neuhauser D. Prophylactic cholecystectomy or expectant management of silent gallstones. Ann Intern Med 1983; 29:199-204.   Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.Gibney EJ. Asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg 1990; 77:368-72   Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: historic perspective and personal experienc. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1:52-7.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.Spiro HM. Diagnostic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 1992; 339:167-8   Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.Stockmann PT, Soper NJ. Early results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a Teaching Institution. Perspectives in General Surgery 1991; 2:1-24.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL. Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 1993; 217:233-6.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.Hermann RE. Surgery for acute and chronic cholecystitis. Surg Clin North Am 1990; 70:1263-75.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.Zucker KA, Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Graham SM, Buell J, Imbembo AL. Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 1993; 165:508-14.   Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.Kum CK, Goh PMY, Isaac LR, Tekant Y, Ngoi SS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 1994; 81:1651-4.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.Cooperman AM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute, embedded and gangrenous cholecystitis. J Laparosc Surg 1990; 1:37-40.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Scovill WA, Zucker KA. The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 1991; 161:388-92.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.Wilson RG, Macintyre IMC, King PM, Nixon SJ, Saunders JH, Varma JS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis. BMJ 1992; 305:394-6.   Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.Altaca G, Özdemir E, Kilic K, Tokyay R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996; 6:26-8.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.Buanes T, Mjåland O. Complications in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996; 6:266-72.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.Unger SW, Scott JS, Unger HM, Edelman DS. Laparoscopic approach to gall stones in the morbidly obese patient. Surg Endosc 1991; 5:116-7.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.Schirmer BD, Dix J, Edge SB, Hyser MJ, Hanks JB, Aguilar M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the obese patient. Ann Surg 1992; 216:146-52.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.Petelin JB. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg 1993; 165:487-91.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.Cotton PB, Baillie J, Pappas TN, Meyers WS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the biliary endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:94-6.   Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.Hunter JG. Laparoscopic trancystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg 1992; 163:53-8.   Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.Sackier JM, Berci G, Paz-Partlow M. Laparoscopic transcystic choledochollithotomy as an adjunct to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 57:323-6.   Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.Stoker ME, Leveillee RJ, McCann JC Jr, Maini BS. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Laparosc Surg 1991; 1:287-93.   Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.Carroll BJ, Phillips EH, Daykhovsky L, Grundfest WS, Gershman A, Fallas M, et al. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992; 2:15-21.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.Prasad A, Foley RJE. Laparoscopic management of cholecystocolic fistula. Br J Surg 1994; 81:1789-90.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.Edelman DS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under continuous epidural anesthesia in patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Dis Child 1991; 145:723-4.   Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.Pezet D, Fondrinier E, Rotman N, Guy L, Lemesle P, Lointier P, et al. Parietal seeding of carcinoma of the gallbladder after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1992; 79:230.   Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.Yerdel MA, Tsuge H, Mimura H, Sakagami K, Mori M, Orita K. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: expanding indications. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993; 3:180-3.   Back to cited text no. 78
    
79.Morrell DG, Mullis R, Harrison PB. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during pregnancy in symptomatic patients. Surgery 1992; 112:856-9.  Back to cited text no. 79
    
80.Comitalo JB, Lynch D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the pregnant patient. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994; 4:268-71.  Back to cited text no. 80
    
81.Martin IG, Holdsworth PJ, Asker J, Baltas B, Glinatsis MT, Sue-Ling H, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a routine procedure for gaastones: results of an 'all comers' policy. Br J Surg 1992; 79:807-10.  Back to cited text no. 81
    
82.Testas P, Delaitre B. Chirurgie digestive par voie coelioscopique, Paris, Edition Maloine, 1991.   Back to cited text no. 82
    
83.Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992; 2:191-8.  Back to cited text no. 83
    
84.Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko S-T, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 1993; 165:9-14.  Back to cited text no. 84
    
85.Orlando R, Russel JC, Lynch J, Mattie A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A Statewide experience. Arch Surg 1993; 128:494-9.  Back to cited text no. 85
    
86.Wherry DC, Rob CG, Marhon MR, Rich NM. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of defense. Ann Surg 1994; 220:626-34.  Back to cited text no. 86
    
87.Wherry DC, Marhon MR, Malanoski MP, Hetz SP, Rich NM. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of defense. Ann Surg 1996; 224:145-54.  Back to cited text no. 87
    
88.Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM, and the west of Scotland laparoscopic cholecystectomy audit group. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5,913 cases. Br J Surg 1996; 83:1356-60.  Back to cited text no. 88
    
89.Berci G, Sackier J. The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 161:382-4.   Back to cited text no. 89
    
90.Strasberg S, Sanabria J, Clavien P. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Surg 1992; 35:275-80.  Back to cited text no. 90
    
91.Bailey R, Zucker K, Flowers J, Scovill WA, Graham SM, Imbembo AL. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 1991; 214:531-41   Back to cited text no. 91
    
92.Périssat J, Collet D, Vitale G, Belliard R, Sosso M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using intracorporeal lithotripsy. Am J Surg 1991 ; 161:371-6.   Back to cited text no. 92
    
93.Peters J, Gibbons G, Innes J, Nichols KE, Front ME, Roby SR, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 1991; 110:769-78.   Back to cited text no. 93
    
94.Reddick E, Olsen D, Spaw A, Baird D, Asbun H, O|Reilly M, et al. Safe performance of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 1991; 161:377-81.   Back to cited text no. 94
    
95.Soper N. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a promising new } branch~ in the algorithm of gallstone management. Surgery 1991; 109:342-4.  Back to cited text no. 95
    
96.Voyles R, Petro A, Meena A, Haick AJ, Koury AM. A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991; 161:365-70.   Back to cited text no. 96
    
97.Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg 1992; 215:209-16.   Back to cited text no. 97
    
98.Périssat J, Collet D, Belliard R, Desplantez J, Magne E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the state of the art. A report on 700 consecutive cases. World J Surg 1992; 16:1074-82.   Back to cited text no. 98
    
99.Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, et al. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta analysis. Ann Surg 1996; 224:609-20.  Back to cited text no. 99
    
100.Steele RJC, Marshall K, Lang M, Doran J. Introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a large teaching hospital: independent audit of the first 3 years. Br J Surg 1995; 82:968-71.  Back to cited text no. 100
    
101.Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, Saunders-Kirkwood K, Zinner MJ, Cates JA. Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg 1993; 218:129-37.  Back to cited text no. 101
    
102.Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy:hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg 1994; 81:1362-5.  Back to cited text no. 102
    
103.Gadacz TR. U.S. experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993; 165:450-4.  Back to cited text no. 103
    
104.Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1990;160:485-7.   Back to cited text no. 104
    
105.Zegarra RF, Saba AK, Peschiera JL. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safe and cost effective. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997; 7:487-90.  Back to cited text no. 105
    
106.Kurzawinski T, Hayter B, Tate J, Davidson B, Hobbs KEF. The cost implications of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. Gut 1992; 33:S64.   Back to cited text no. 106
    
107.McIntyre RC Jr, Zoeter MA, Weil KC, Cohen MM. A comparison of outcome and cost of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992; 2:143-8.   Back to cited text no. 107
    
108.Fullarton GM, Darling K, Williams J, MacMillan R, Bell G. Evaluation of the cost of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1994; 81:124-6.  Back to cited text no. 108
    
109.Stevens HPJD, Marjan van de Berg, Ruseler CH, Wereldsma JCJ. Clinical and financial aspects of cholecystectomy: laparoscopic versus open technique. World J Surg 1997; 21:91-7.  Back to cited text no. 109
    
110.Berggren U, Zethraeus N, Arvidsson D, Haglund U, Jonsson B. A cost-minimization analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1996; 172:305-10.  Back to cited text no. 110
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Symptomatology
    Historical Persp...
    Laparoscopic Cho...
    Indications and ...
   Results of LC
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2570    
    Printed123    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded165    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Advertise | Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Disclaimer
© Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 05th September, 2010