Journal of Family and Community Medicine

: 1997  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 46--52

Factors associated with patient's care during consultation in ministry of health facilities, Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia

Omar M Balbaid, Kasim M Al-Dawood 
 Joint Programme of Family & Community Medicine, Jeddah and Department of Family & Community Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Kasim M Al-Dawood
P.O. Box 2290, Al-Khobar 31952
Saudi Arabia


Objective: To assess the factors affecting health care and patient«SQ»s satisfaction during the consultation. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire form on a random sample of outpatient clinic attendants. Setting: The Outpatient Department clinics at King Fahad and King Abdulaziz Hospital in addition to eleven Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) in Jeddah. Subjects: A sample of 340 subjects attending clinics of two hospitals and eleven PHCCs. Methods : Direct interviewing of subjects using a structured questionnaire was carried out. Information collected was basic demographic data regarding satis­faction with aspects of outpatient health care. Results : The rate of patients«SQ» satisfaction in all facilities was 76.5% with no significant variation between hospitals and Primary Health Care Centers. The study showed aspects of poor patient care, such as short consultation time and incomplete physical examination of patients. Other factors correlated with mean consultation time and completeness of physical examination were stressed. Conclusion : There was a low rate of patients«SQ» satisfaction in all Ministry of Health (MOH) facilities studied. Aspects related to patient care need to be im­proved. Practical recommendations on this were stressed

How to cite this article:
Balbaid OM, Al-Dawood KM. Factors associated with patient's care during consultation in ministry of health facilities, Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia.J Fam Community Med 1997;4:46-52

How to cite this URL:
Balbaid OM, Al-Dawood KM. Factors associated with patient's care during consultation in ministry of health facilities, Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Community Med [serial online] 1997 [cited 2020 Aug 10 ];4:46-52
Available from:

Full Text


The satisfaction of the consumer of health service is recognized as a powerful tool for quality assurance, [1],[2],[3] since more emphasis is placed on outcome than process and structure evaluation.' To be effective, the quality assurance should be evaluative and continuous. [4],[5] The health service provided to patients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has improved a great deal over the past two decades. [4],[6] Nevertheless, to con­solidate what has been achieved, there is a need for continuous monitoring of both quantity and quality of the service .[6] Con­sultation plays an important role in deter­mining both the quality of care and patients' satisfaction.

Studies have been carried out on the subject of the consultation and doctor­patient encounter in Saudi primary, secon­dary and tertiary care establishments. [4],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] However, most of these studies are limited and their results are unique to the facility studied. Indeed, almost all of them lack the comparison of the different levels of health care facilities. The objective of this study was to assess factors including consultation time, completeness of physical examina­tion, laboratory investigations, prescrip­tions and patients' satisfaction with the consultation provided at the Ministry of Health Hospitals and Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) in Jeddah. We hope that the results will help the concerned plan­ners, administrators and decision makers at the Ministry of Health (MOH) to rectify any short-comings in patients' satisfaction and care.


This cross-sectional study was conducted in 11 PHCCs and the outpatient clinics of King Fahad, and King Abdulaziz hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. These two hospi­tals were randomly selected from a total of 8 MOH hospitals in Jeddah. The eleven PHCCs (30.6%) were randomly selected from the 36 PHCCs in Jeddah. Their distri­bution was as follows: (1) Three from the 11 PHCCs serving the North Eastern dis­trict, (2) Two from the 8 PHCCs serving the North Western district, (3) Three from the 11 PHCCs serving the South Eastern district, (4) One from the six PHCCs serv­ing the South Western districts and (5) Two from the 8 PHCCs serving the Jeddah city center district.

The selection of these health facilities was planned in accordance with the mini­mum requirements of ten PHCCs recom­ mended by the International Network of Rational Use of Drugs (INRUD) when evaluating patient care. [11] At the hospitals, five outpatient speciality clinics were ran­domly selected. Twelve patients were sub­sequently randomly selected from each clinic at the two hospitals, giving a total sample of 120 patients.

Twenty patients were selected randomly from each PHCC, giving a total of 220 pa­tients. Each patient was registered and in­terviewed on leaving the clinic by one of the investigators using a pre-tested and pre­coded questionnaire and a checklist de­signed for the purpose. Patients' medical files were also reviewed to collect the nec­essary data. Information included basic demographic characteristics, monthly in­come in Saudi Riyals, and patient type: whether new or for follow-up. The type of physical examination (none, partial, or complete) offered to patients was also noted. Partial (minimum) physical exami­nation was defined as only recording body temperature and pulse rate. [11] Information obtained from the patient included the de­gree of satisfaction on care provided in the facility, laboratory investigations requested, prescription and number of drugs on the prescription. Data about physicians in­cluded age, Arabic speaking or not, gender, nationality (non-Saudi, Saudi), professional status (consultant, specialist, resident), and length of experience. The time from each patient entering to leaving the clinic was noted and the overall consultation time was computed.

A reliability test was conducted on 20% of the sample by telephone or personal en­counters 8-12 days after the initial survey. The test indicated a reliability of 92%.

Data were entered and analyzed on a personal computer using Epi-Info version 5 and SPSS-PC+ statistical packages. [12],[13] Chi-squared test was used to assess the level of significance of the differences be­tween proportions. Multiple regression was used to assess the factors predicting patient care in the health facilities. The outcome (dependent) variables analyzed (one at a time) were mean consultation time at PHCCs and hospitals, and completeness of physical examination (coded 1 = none, 2 = partial, 3 = complete) at both PHCCs and hospitals. The independent factors were patient's age, education, gender (coded as 1 = male, 2 = female), nationality (1 = non­Saudi, 2 = Saudi), patient type, mean con­sultation time, type of physical examina­tion, and degree of patient's satisfaction (0 = not satisfied, 1 = satisfied). Other vari­ables included were: investigations, pre­scriptions, number of drugs prescribed, physician's age, mother tongue ( 1 = non­Arabic, 2 = Arabic), gender (1 = male, 2 = female), nationality (1 = non-Saudi, 2 = Saudi), physician's status (1 = consultant, 2 = specialist, 3 = resident), experience (1 = 0-5 years, 2 = more than 5-10 years, 3 = more than 10 years), and overall mean con­sultation time.


1. Sample characteristics

Saudis represented 39.1% of the total sample. Slightly more than half (51.5%) of the patients were females. Under a third (30%) of the patients received no medica­tion. Slightly less than half of the sample (47.1%) were illiterates, while only 15.6% had college degrees. Of the 59 physicians interviewed, 25 (42.4%) were males and 21 (35.6%) were Saudis. Eight (13.6%) of all physicians were consultants working in hospitals, 11 (18.6%) were specialists, and 40 (67.8%) were residents. There was a significant inverse correlation between mean consultation time and number of drugs prescribed during consultation (r = 0.15,p<0.01).

2. Primary Health Care Clinics

Between the PHCCs the mean (± SE) con­sultation time showed a significant varia­tion ranging from 0.5 + 0.1 minutes to 7.8 +_ 0.3 minutes (p < 0.04). The degree of patient's satisfaction was found to be re­lated to the completeness of the physical examination offered (p < 0.0001). The de­gree of completeness of physical examina­tion offered at the PHC centres was not significantly different one from another (p< 0.49), neither was the level of patients' satisfaction (P < 0.5)[Table 1]. Other sig­nificant multiple logistic regression analy­sis results are summarized in [Table 2].{Table 1}{Table 2}

3. Hospital Clinics

Similar to the findings at all facilities, the mean consultation time at hospitals was significantly inversely correlated with the number of drugs prescribed per consulta­tion (r = 0.21, p < 0.05). However, no significant variation was found between the two hospitals (p < 0.05). Regarding pa­tient's satisfaction no differences were found among the hospitals' clinics (p < 0.3) [Table 1].


The patients' sample was almost equally represented by both genders. Non-Saudi patients constituted the majority of the sample, a fact that may reflect the size of this group of patients attending MOH fa­cilities.

A. Consultation time

The significant variation of mean consul­tation time between PHCCs (5.94 + 0.2 minutes) and hospitals' clinics (8.62 + 0.3 minutes) in this study could be explained by the system being followed at these fa­cilities. PHCCs are essentially walk-in clinics and physicians, therefore, see a large number of patients. Consequently, consultations are brief. This has been shown to be true in both developing 14,15 and developed countries1 [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] with some exceptions. [19] However, the mean consultation time in PHCCs in this study is much better than what was reported earlier from rural PHCCs in Saudi Arabia [7],[8],[9] and is close to that reported by Al-Shaman in 1991. [6]

On the other hand, physicians working at hospitals do see their patients, who are limited in number, according to an ap­pointment system. Even with this, the mean consultation time was less than 10 minutes. Generally, studies have shown that consultations of less than 10 minutes duration have little impact on health pro­motion. [20]

An alternative explanation for short con­sultation may be related to the practice methods of physicians in Saudi Arabia. In some hospitals and PHCCs, physicians may not offer the basic patient's management during consultation even if the patient is the last on the list.

In the present study, the mean consulta­tion time at PHCCs was inversely corre­lated with the number of drugs prescribed, and this supports similar findings reported by other investigators. [19] At hospitals, mean consultation time was inversely correlated with increased experience and female doc­tors but positively correlated with the phy­sician's status. Others have reported the same results earlier. [21],[22] The gender of fe­male patients in our study was shown to correlate positively with mean consultation time. This was reported in studies both from Saudi Arabia and from Western countries, indicating that female patients demand more elaborate explanation from physicians than males. [10],[23] Patients' level of education was not shown to affect the mean length of consultation as shown by others. [24]-[25] Differences in socio-cultural backgrounds of the two communities may have led to this variation. Arabic language speaking physicians had, on average, longer consultation time. This might show the effect of cultural background of patients on physicians. This is especially so in the community from which this sample with an illiteracy rate of 47% was drawn. It is known that physicians communicate better if they have adequate consultation time. [6] Other research has shown that patient satis­faction is well related to good doctor­patient communication. [26],[27],[28]

B. Physical Examination

At all facilities, the degree of completeness of physical examination correlated posi­tively with the degree of patient's satisfac­tion. This is in agreement with other researchers. [2] Generally, complete physical examinations performed in this study were much fewer than those reported from other developing countries. [19]

C. Laboratory investigations and pre­scriptions

In this study, prescriptions were issued to 70% of the patients, while laboratory in­vestigations were requested for 91% of the sample. The rate of prescriptions issued at PHCCs in this study (66.8%) was less than that reported from similar studies in Saudi Arabia [6],[29] and elsewhere. [14],[19] At hospitals, the rates of both prescriptions issued (75.8%) and laboratory investigations re­quested (97%) were much more than what was previously reported from Saudi Ara­bia.' °

D. Patients' satisfaction

The finding of a 76.5% rate of patients' satisfaction in this study in all facilities with no significant variations among them supports that of similar studies from Saudi Arabia . [4],[10] The figures reported for inpa­tients ranged from 74% - 93%° and for outpatients from 66.4% - 95.2%. [10] How­ever, our rate was far below the expected figure. [30] This indicates the need for reme­dial action.

In conclusion, the results of this study revealed a low rate of patient's satisfaction in all the MOH facilities studied. Certain aspects relating to patient care need to be improved. A reduction in the number of patients at hospital outpatient clinics and the introduction of an appointment system at least for follow-up patients at PHCCs should be attempted. Arabic-speaking phy­sicians should be preferred to work at these health facilities in order to improve patient­ doctor communication. The provision of more time for consultation and complete physical examination, as well as better communication with patients, will defi­nitely improve patients' satisfaction and the outcome of consultation. Moreover, there is a need to revise the current practice and training of our physicians so that they can master the necessary consultation skills. [31] , [32] Quality assurance departments at these health facilities should monitor this process through the continuous auditing of patients' care. Therefore, the need for studies like these to evaluate the success and the impact of any reform measures un­dertaken will remain.


1Kibbe DC, Bentz E, Maclaughlin CP. Continuous quality improvement for continuity of care. J Fam Pract 1993-,36:304-6.
2Hill J, Bird HA, Hopkins R, Lawton C, Wright V. Survey of satisfaction with care in a rheumatology outpatient clinic. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51:195-7.
3Peck DF. Survey of out-patient satisfaction in a general hospital. Health Bull Edinburgh 1993; 51:63-66.
4AI-Umran K, Albar A, Al-Awdah S, Al-Jaber S, Wosornu L. Patient satisfaction survey in a teach­ing hospital: Preliminary results. Journal of Family and Community Medicine 1995; 2:14-20.
5Vuori HV. Quality Assurance of health services. Copenhagen: WHO Publications, 1982.
6AI-Shammari SA. Factors associated with consul­tation time in Riyadh Primary Health Care Cen­tres, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 1991; 12:371-5.
7Sebai ZA. The health of the family in a changing Arabia. Jeddah: Tihama Publications, 1983.
8Sebai ZA. Health profile of selected communities In: Health in Saudi Arabia. 1st ed. Riyadh: Tihama Publications, 1985: 39-130.
9Banoub SN. Primary health care in the Qasim Region. In: Sebai ZA, editor. Community Health in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh: The Riyadh Al-Kharj Hospital Programme, 1982: 59-70.
10Al-Dawood KM, Elzubier AG. Patient's expecta­tions and satisfaction in a teaching hospital outpa­tient clinic, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 1996; 17:245-250.
11Anonymous. Proposed methods for prescribing and patient care indicators. INRUD News 1991; 2: 9­10.
12Dean AG, Dean JA, Burton AH, Dicker RC. Epi­Info, Version 5; a word processing, database, and statistics programme for epidemiology and com­puters. USD, Incorporated, Stone Mountain, Georgia, 1990.
13SPSS-PC+ Statistical Package (Computer Pro­gram), Version 4.0, SPSS Inc; 1984-1990.
14Bimo. Field testing of the drug use indicators. INRUD News 1991; 2:9.
15Anonymous. Results of indicators studies carried out since 1990. INRUD News 1992; 3:12.
16Evans BT. A communication skills programme for increasing patient satisfaction with general practice consultation. Br Med J Psychol 1987-,60: 373-8.
17Morrell DC, Evans ME, Morris RW, Roland MD. "The five minutes" consultation: Effect of time constraints on clinical content and patient satisfac­tion. BMJ 1986; 292:870-3.
18Knight R. The importance of list size and consul­tation length as factors in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987; 27: 19-22.
19Tomson G. Pilot study of drug use indicators in Sweden. INRUD News 1992; 3:3.
20Morell DC, Roland MO. How can good general practitioner care be achieved. BMJ 1987; 294:161-2.
21Cooke M, Ronalds C. Women doctors in urban general practice: The doctors. BMJ 1985; 290:755-58.
22Wilson AD. Consultation length: general practitio­ners' attitudes and practices. BMJ 1985; 290: 1322-24.
23Harris J. You can't ask if you don't know what to ask: a survey of the information needs and re­sources of hospital outpatients. NZ Med J 1992; 934: 199-202.
24John F. Trends in general practice. London: Pub­lished for the Royal College of General Practitio­ners by BMJ, Devonshire Press, 1979.
25Tuckett D, Boulton M, Olson C, Williams A. Meetings between experts: An approach to sharing ideas in medical consultations. London: Tavistock Publications, 1985.
26Sanchez-Memegay C, Hudes ES, Cummings SR. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with medi­cal care for upper respiratory tract infection. J Gen Intern Med 1992; 7:432-4.
27Kincey J, Bradshaw P, Ley P. Patients' satisfaction and reported acceptance of advice in general prac­tice. J Coll General Prac 1975; 25:558-66.
28Treadway J. Patient satisfaction and the content of general practice consultations. J Coll General Pract 1983; 33:769.
29A1-Dawood KM. Evaluation of rational drug pre­scribing in a postgraduate primary health care teaching set-up, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Family and Community Medicine 1994; 1:41-5.
30Vuori H. Patient satisfaction - Does it matter? Qual Assur in Health Care 1991; 3:183-189.
31Stott NCH, Davis RH. The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract 1979; 29:201-5.
32Middleton JF. The exceptional potential of the consultation revisited. J R Coll Gen Pract 1989; 39:383-6.