Journal of Family & Community Medicine
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 
 

Users Online: 846 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

 

 Table of Contents 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 144-145  

Author's reply


1 Department of Community Medicine, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India
2 Department of Physiology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India

Date of Web Publication29-Apr-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Zahid A Khan
Department of Community Medicine, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2230-8229.257312

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Khan ZA, Singh C, Khan T. Author's reply. J Fam Community Med 2019;26:144-5

How to cite this URL:
Khan ZA, Singh C, Khan T. Author's reply. J Fam Community Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 23];26:144-5. Available from: http://www.jfcmonline.com/text.asp?2019/26/2/144/257312

Thanks for the critical review of our manuscript entitled “Correlates of physical disability in the elderly population of rural North India.” Two comments raised by the reader have been responded as follow

1. With respect to comment no. 1 raised on the estimation of the sample size for the study, we took the relative precision of 20%, which agrees with the literature in which 10%–20% is considered the relative precision for the estimation of sample size. The reference [1] which the reader gives in support of his view deals with absolute precision, not relative precision

Sample size may be estimated by using either absolute precision or relative precision as follows:

  1. Formula using absolute precision:


  2. N = Z2p (1− p)/E2

    where N = Sample size

    Z = 1.96

    p = Anticipated prevalence

    E = absolute precision

  3. Formula using relative precision:


  4. N = Z2p (1− p)/(pd)2

    where N = Sample size

    Z = 1.96

    p = Anticipated prevalence

    d = relative precision.


In our study, we estimated the sample size on the basis of relative precision and as we took 20% relative precision for the anticipated prevalence of 23.4% in our study, the absolute precision for our study would be 4.68%, which is in agreement with the reference [1] mentioned by the reader.

According to the reference [1] cited in his letter, the reader indicated that most authors have recommended 5% precision (absolute) when prevalence was between 10% and 90%. If prevalence was 10%, a 5% absolute precision would be equal to 50% relative precision which would be too high. Going by the relative precision method, 20% relative precision for 10% prevalence equals 2% absolute precision (10% relative precision for this prevalence will give an absolute precision of 1%), which gives a valid sample size. Therefore, it is preferable to use relative precision to estimate the sample size to avoid any issues about the estimate by the relative anticipated prevalence

2. We appreciate the reader's comment on the use of scoring in the Barthel scale to assess disability. However, we aimed to find the prevalence of disability in the elderly, which is a qualitative assessment. The use of scoring would have given a quantitative assessment of disability of the individuals which can be used to evaluate improvement in the disability such as a comparison of the score before and after any treatment or rehabilitation. Thus, if the respondent had a disability in any of the 10 items on the Barthel index, he/she would be considered physically disabled. Besides, this scale itself does not give any cutoff point at which a person can be described as disabled.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2013;6:14-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed87    
    Printed88    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded23    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Advertise | Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Disclaimer
Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 05th September, 2010