Journal of Family & Community Medicine
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 
 

Users Online: 925 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

 

 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 114-119  

Pathway to care and clinical profile of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in New Delhi, India


1 Department of Pediatrics, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India
2 Department of Psychiatry, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India

Date of Web Publication3-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ankur Sachdeva
Department of Psychiatry, Room Number 9, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, NH-3, NIT, Faridabad - 121 001, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_142_16

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood neurobehavioral disorder, which may cause impairment in multiple domains. Understanding the pathway to care helps in planning effective early interventions. The study aims to provide a quantitative description of the factors affecting the help-seeking pathway.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at an outpatients department of a tertiary care multispecialty hospital. Fifty consecutive consenting children aged 5–15 years were screened and diagnosed for ADHD using Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition text revision criteria, and Kiddie Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to study the pathway of care, using the WHO template. The data were analyzed using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests in SPSS software.
RESULTS: The average delay from the onset of the illness to first consultation with a qualified health professional was 2.32 ± 1.9 years. Children with an urban background, from a nuclear family, with literate mothers, with a family income of more than Rs. 30,000/month, having hyperactive and combined type of ADHD, and who were referred by school teachers presented significantly earlier. The main source of referrals were school teachers and general medical practitioners. The most common parental beliefs for delay were the views that the “child is naughty” and that “hyperactivity is part of normal growth.”
CONCLUSION: Parents' help-seeking behavior is affected by different sociocultural beliefs. Such factors as the lack of recognition and awareness of ADHD, resulting in the delay in seeking treatment should be addressed through health promotion programs.

Keywords: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fourth edition text revision, India, pathway to care


How to cite this article:
Anand P, Sachdeva A, Kumar V. Pathway to care and clinical profile of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in New Delhi, India. J Fam Community Med 2018;25:114-9

How to cite this URL:
Anand P, Sachdeva A, Kumar V. Pathway to care and clinical profile of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in New Delhi, India. J Fam Community Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 8];25:114-9. Available from: http://www.jfcmonline.com/text.asp?2018/25/2/114/231798


   Introduction Top


Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a complex childhood neurobehavioral disorder, affecting approximately 5% of children of school-going age. ADHD manifests with features of hyperactivity, inattention and impulsivity in various combinations, with onset before 7 years of age.[1] ADHD, which may persist into adulthood, affects an estimated 1% to 4% of adults worldwide.[2] It has an impact on multiple domains of life, including academic functioning with possible long-term consequences on the quality of life in adulthood.[3],[4],[5],[6]

The long delay between the initial onset of the symptoms and formal diagnosis of ADHD has raised concerns in that it can result in increased functional impairment (e.g. poorer educational and psychosocial outcomes)[4],[7] and financial burden.[8],[9] Furthermore, despite available unequivocal role of evidence-based treatments, ADHD is underdiagnosed and specialist services are still underutilized.[10]

This is of particular concern considering the available extensive scientific evidence indicating that children with ADHD may benefit immensely from a range of interventions, including medications and nonpharmacological therapy.[11],[12] Recent international guidelines emphasize the need for a better understanding of access to health-care services available to these children and their families and identify possibilities for improvement.[12]

The first care provider is considered the most important link, as he/she provides a valuable pointer toward further help. Failure to identify and diagnose at this level is one of the main impediments in the pathway to care.[13] Parents have been considered the primary gatekeepers of access to specialist services.[13] They usually seek help when children with ADHD have difficulties at school,[14] and teachers are often the primary referral points for specialist services. Factors such as societal belief systems, ignorance, and stigma for psychiatric disorders determine the initial pathway to treatment.[15],[16]

There are very few studies which have assessed the pathway of care in childhood psychiatric illness in India, and the data are limited if present. Understanding the pathway to care for any illness helps in the planning of effective early interventions. We could not find any Indian study conducted on a similar topic in a pediatric setup, in spite of the fact that many patients with ADHD are initially brought to the pediatric unit. Moreover, the social, cultural, and individual factors involved in access to specialist services in India are so diverse that assessment is complicated and can only be done in a series of studies. The exploration of underlying hidden factors which impact the help-seeking behavior need detailed research. Hence, the study was planned on a sample of ADHD patients in a tertiary care center in North India to provide a quantitative description of the factors affecting the help-seeking pathway and investigate the relative contributions of illness and patient-related factors in determining the use of the service.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was conducted at a tertiary care multispecialty hospital at New Delhi, India. Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry of the medical college associated with the hospital were involved in the study conducted in a year, from March 2010 to March 2011. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and Thesis Review committee. The participants were assured of the confidentiality of the collected data, and it use for research purposes only. A written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the children before the study.

Children aged 5–15 years presenting at the Pediatrics Outpatient Department (OPD) of the hospital were screened for symptoms of ADHD using Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form (CPRS-R: S) and behavioral observation. CPRS-R: S is a 27-item, 4-point Likert scale with proven validity and reliability.[17] Those screened positive were examined by a psychiatrist and diagnosed as ADHD using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition text revision criteria and Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and lifetime version (KSADS-PL). The K-SADS-PL is a semi-structured diagnostic interview designed to assess current and past episodes of psychopathology in children and adolescents.[18] K-SADS-PL helped to confirm the diagnosis of ADHD and exclude other significant childhood psychiatric disorders.

Detailed histories were taken and thorough physical examinations were done to rule out any acute physical illness, hearing or visual defect, gross brain damage, epilepsy, and autism. The assessment was done by the first and second authors. Intelligence quotient assessment was done in suspected or borderline cases to rule out mental retardation. The exclusion criteria were any acute physical illness that required hospital admission as well as autism, mental retardation, chronic physical disability such as hearing or visual impairment, epilepsy, and psychosis. Children of either sex, aged from 5 to 15 years, accompanied by at least one parent (living with the children since birth), and willing to give written informed consent were included in the study. All patients who fulfilled the selection criteria were selected for the detailed assessment.

A semi-structured questionnaire was used to obtain information on personal characteristics, sociodemographic, and illness-related variables. To assess the pathway of care, the basic WHO encounter form available on the WHO website [19] was used to generate a semi-structured questionnaire. It included information on help/treatment-seeking behavior such as reasons for delay in seeking help, duration of the delay, first qualified caregiver contacted, and the final source of referral to the tertiary care pediatric clinic. The questionnaire was administered on the 1st day of contact with the parents.

The data were carefully analyzed using SPSS Inc. Released 2008. SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA), with the help of a statistician. The data collected for cases and controls were entered in the Excel program. Confidence interval of 95% was used. For descriptive data, a simple table was prepared. Sociodemographic variables and clinical parameters were correlated with the delay in the help-seeking pathway (in years) using the unpaired t-test and ANOVA, depending on the number of variables to be assessed. For all analyses, probability of 5% or less represented as statistical significance.


   Results Top


A total of 62 children were screened for inclusion in the study. However, 7 of the screened children were excluded after psychiatric examination as they did not fulfill the criteria for ADHD after KSADS-PL assessment and clinical examination. Three of the parents did not consent to the study and follow-up. Two children had comorbid disorders (epilepsy and severe mental retardation) and had to be excluded. Thus, a total of 50 children were enrolled and completed the study.

The majority of patients were aged 5–10 years (n = 44, 88%). Only 6 were aged 10–15 years. There were more male children (n = 35, 70%) than females (n = 15). Most of these children came from urban areas (n = 42, 84%). Children living in nuclear families formed the major subgroup (n = 35, 70%). A majority of the children were classified as ADHD-combined type (n = 33, 66%) followed by ADHD-hyperactive type (n = 12, 24%) [Table 1].
Table 1: Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the studied children (n=50)

Click here to view


The delay in seeking treatment for ADHD was assessed. The mean delay from the first onset of the illness to first consultation with a qualified health professional, in our subset of patients, was 2.32 ± 1.9 years [Table 1]. The children in the age group 5–10 years presented with a mean delay of 2.3 years, while the mean delay in those aged 10–15 years was 2.7 years (P = 0.601). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the mean delay of male and female children (P = 0.253) and type of school they attended (government or private school) (P = 0.076).

Children from urban backgrounds presented significantly earlier than those from rural areas (P = 0.015). We found that higher maternal education, living in a nuclear family, and higher family income tended toward seeking earlier consultation for ADHD (P < 0.01). Children with combined and hyperactive type of ADHD presented significantly earlier than children with inattentive type of ADHD (P = 0.002). Children referred by the school teachers presented significantly earlier than the referrals from the health practitioners (1.8 years vs. 2.2 years).

Most of the children had pediatricians (n = 26, 52%) as the first level of contact with a qualified health professional, followed by general medical practitioners (GMP) (n = 14,28%). Only 4 children had contacted a psychiatrist at the first level [Table 2].
Table 2: First level of contact of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder children with qualified health professional (n=50)

Click here to view


The majority of the patients were referred by school teachers (n = 14, 28%) followed by GMP (n = 12, 24%). Six children were sent by relatives or family members, four from social workers and two by the faith healers. Pediatricians also referred six children to the tertiary center for management [Table 3].
Table 3: Various sources of referral of the participants to pediatrics service (n=50)

Click here to view


[Table 4] depicts the reasons given by the family members for the delay in seeking help. The most common reason for the delay was that they thought the children were “just naughty” not that they had any disorder (n = 42, 84%), followed by belief that “hyperactivity was part of normal growth” (n = 32, 64%) and that the children would improve with time (n = 28, 56%). Lack of awareness of treatment options and associated stigma also contributed significantly to the delay.
Table 4: Reasons given by the family members for the delay in seeking treatment (n=50)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The study was conducted to evaluate the pathway of care for children with ADHD presenting at a pediatric clinic in India. The present study was significant in that it was the first to evaluate the pathway to care in ADHD children in pediatric clinic in India. Earlier studies were conducted in a psychiatric setup.[20]

In this study, 26 (52%) children had their first contact with a pediatrician, but only 4 (8%) saw a psychiatrist in the first instance. This is in contrast to a few previous studies which reported that 31% and 51% of children with ADHD initially saw a psychiatrist.[20],[21] There is confusion in the minds of the general public as well as medical practitioners on the nature and treatment domains of ADHD (psychiatric disorder or pediatric disorder). There could be reporting bias also, as parents may not have revealed the entire truth, because of the stigma associated with a visit to a psychiatrist. This may also be the reason why many parents first consult a pediatrician. A study in adults showing a similar trend indicated that only 9.2% of the patients had psychiatrists as their first point of contact.[22] Furthermore, 40% of the children first saw GMP, neurologists, and AYUSH practitioners as the first level of contact. This underpins the importance of GMPs and allied health professionals, as people with deep roots in our society, able to provide guidance on appropriate treatment.

School teachers were the main source of referral to our center (28%). Arya et al. also reported high referrals from school teachers (45.6%),[20] so did Wilcox et al., who also identified school teachers as the main source of referral.[14] ADHD children often perform poorly academically and have, difficulty concentrating on their work because of hyperactivity and inattentiveness. Therefore, teachers, who are aware of the disorder, can easily identify them in the classrooms. This underpins the importance of school teachers in early recognition of ADHD. Various studies have reported that teachers' knowledge on ADHD is inadequate.[23],[24],[25] Considering the crucial role of teachers play in the pathway to the care of ADHD, there should be compulsory mental health education in the comprehensive health programme for teachers.

Health practitioners (GMP, pediatricians, and neurologists) referred a significant number of children (44%). In a previous study, GMPs referred around 9% of the children.[20] Sayal and Taylorindicated the prominent role of GMPs in the pathway to care and acknowledged that delay in referring these children was mainly due to nonrecognition by GMPs.[13],[26] Adequate training (including periodic lectures and orientation sessions by qualified professionals) should be given to GMPs on ADHD so that they can refer these children in a timely manner.

Relatives/family members and social workers were also an important source of referral for these patients (20%). Parents sometimes think of the symptoms of ADHD as a part of normal child development, and therefore, a check by someone close in the extended family is essential. This is what makes public awareness and outreach programs important. More health workers should be trained to screen children for ADHD and encourage people to seek treatment as they easily identify with the cultural and religious beliefs of the people. Two children were also referred by faith healers which indicate that our society still has trust in such forms of treatment. In an adult study, 68.5% psychiatric patients were referred by faith healers.[22] However, that study was conducted in an exclusive psychiatric hospital in Central India, where certain beliefs on the origin of mental illnesses are common.

We found that the mean delay in seeking the first consultation was approximately 2.35 years, in spite of the fact that the majority (90%) of children had hyperactive and combined type of ADHD, suggesting that there were gross ignorance and unawareness on the part of the parents and teachers. Arya et al. reported a mean delay of 3.9 years in seeking treatment.[20] The difference may be due to the hospital setup. Our study was conducted in a pediatric unit, while the study referred to above was done in a psychiatric unit. Significant stigma is associated with consulting a psychiatrist, and parents are always anxious to avoid having their child labeled with a disease.[27]

The long delay from the onset of the disorder to the first contact with a specialized professional is common to many psychiatric disorders and is attributed to one or more of three factors: stigma, ignorance, and lack of access to specialized care. Strategies such as the training of pediatricians, general practitioners (GPs), teachers, and social workers; and the education of families on the symptoms, nature, treatability, and appropriate guidance could shorten this delay and help to seek early intervention.

Early treatment is crucial for ADHD children as delay in seeking treatment aggravates the impairment associated with their symptoms. When parents were asked the reasons for the delay in seeking treatment, the most common response was that patient was naughty (84%) and that hyperactivity was part of the normal process of development (64%). A previous study also reported a similar frequency of such common beliefs as being a naughty child (89.5%) and normal growth process (75.4%).[20] Wilcox et al. reported that parents do not accept the biomedical explanatory model as a cause of symptoms and attribute it to learning and memory difficulties.[14]

The variables of age and gender did not affect the mean delay in seeking treatment. All the same, females presented relatively earlier than boys, as such behavioral problems in boys are considered part of growing/normal childhood. Patients from urban areas presented significantly early (2.2 years) compared to those from rural areas (3.3 years). This may be due to easy accessibility of health-care facilities to the urban population. A study reported that adult psychiatric patients from rural areas traveled a mean distance of 249 km to seek treatment.[22] Children living in an extended family environment throughout the study presented late (2.8 years) compared to those in nuclear families (2.1 years). This was similar to the report by Arya et al.[20] A major reason is the opposition from other family members or relatives.[28] In most extended families of India, the head of the family takes the major decisions. Therefore, they should be taken into confidence to avoid opposition with regard to diagnosis and treatment.

The education of mothers also played a very crucial role as children whose mothers were educated (above 10th standard) presented earlier. This may be due to greater awareness and vigilance of literate mothers to behavioral changes in ADHD children. The role of maternal education has not been described before. Children with good socioeconomic status presented significantly earlier. This also might be due to better education and awareness of parents in this class. However, studies have also reported less delay in middle-income group families.[20] Children with hyperactive and combined type of ADHD presented earlier as compared to inattentive type. This was consistent with previous studies.[13],[20] Children with the hyperactive type of ADHD are very disruptive, usually aggressive and easily identifiable by teachers and parents.

The main limitation of our study is its small sample size and therefore precludes any generalization. The results need to be further validated in large sample size and at other centers. Recall bias of parents cannot be ruled out among parents, since it is difficult to pinpoint the exact onset of illness. Because of the stigma associated with psychiatric illness, reporting bias has to be taken into account. Sociocultural variations in the pathway to care need to be assessed further since our catchment area was mostly urban. However, our study adds to the limited experience of the pathway of the care of ADHD children and emphasizes the need to generate public awareness and increase the knowledge of teachers and health-care professionals on ADHD so that these children can be identified early and the delay of treatment minimized.

We can conclude that the numerous impediments resulting in the delay in seeking help, such as ignorance and the lack of recognition of ADHD should be addressed through health promotion programs. Teachers and GPs form an important source of referral. Parents' help-seeking behavior is affected by various sociocultural beliefs. Understanding the pathway to the care of ADHD children can help in planning early effective interventions.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Goldman LS, Genel M, Bezman RJ, Slanetz PJ. Diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA 1998;279:1100-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Caci H, Doepfner M, Asherson P, Donfrancesco R, Faraone SV, Hervas A, et al. Daily life impairments associated with self-reported childhood/adolescent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and experiences of diagnosis and treatment: Results from the European Lifetime Impairment Survey. Eur Psychiatry 2014;29:316-23.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Klein RG, Mannuzza S, Olazagasti MA, Roizen E, Hutchison JA, Lashua EC, et al. Clinical and functional outcome of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder 33 years later. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012;69:1295-303.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Hodgkins P, Arnold LE, Shaw M, Caci H, Kahle J, Woods AG, et al. Asystematic review of global publication trends regarding long-term outcomes of ADHD. Front Psychiatry 2011;2:84.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Shaw M, Hodgkins P, Caci H, Young S, Kahle J, Woods AG, et al. Asystematic review and analysis of long-term outcomes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects of treatment and non-treatment. BMC Med 2012;10:99.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Purper-Ouakil D, Cortese S, Wohl M, Asch M, Acquaviva E, Falissard B, et al. Predictors of diagnostic delay in a clinical sample of French children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007;16:505-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Coghill D, Soutullo C, d'Aubuisson C, Preuss U, Lindback T, Silverberg M, et al. Impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on the patient and family: Results from a European survey. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2008;2:31.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Harpin VA. The effect of ADHD on the life of an individual, their family, and community from preschool to adult life. Arch Dis Child 2005;90 Suppl 1:i2-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, Ford T. Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in Great Britain. London: The Stationery Office, Office for National Statistics; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Clinical practice guideline: Diagnosis and evaluation of the child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2000;105:1158-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Swanson JM, Sergeant JA, Taylor E, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Jensen PS, Cantwell DP, et al. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder. Lancet 1998;351:429-33.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sayal K, Taylor E, Beecham J, Byrne P. Pathways to care in children at risk of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:43-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Wilcox CE, Washburn R, Patel V. Seeking help for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in developing countries: A study of parental explanatory models in Goa, India. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:1600-10.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Razali SM, Najib MA. Help-seeking pathways among Malay psychiatric patients. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2000;46:281-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Patel V, Simunyu E, Gwanzura F. The pathways to primary mental health care in high-density suburbs in Harare, Zimbabwe. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1997;32:97-103.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Conners CK. CRS–R, Conners' Rating Scales–Revised: Instruments for use with Children and Adolescents. Toronto, North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.; 1997. p. 94, 134.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, et al. Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36:980-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Available from: http://www.apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/61855/1/MNH_NAT_87.1.pdf. [Last accessed on 2016 Jun 20].  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Arya A, Agarwal V, Yadav S, Gupta PK, Agarwal M. A study of pathway of care in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Asian J Psychiatr 2015;17:10-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Caci H, Cohen D, Bonnot O, Kabuth B, Raynaud JP, Paillé S, et al. Health care trajectories for children with ADHD in France: Results from the QUEST survey. J Atten Disord 2016. pii: 1087054715618790.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lahariya C, Singhal S, Gupta S, Mishra A. Pathway of care among psychiatric patients attending a mental health institution in central India. Indian J Psychiatry 2010;52:333-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Ghanizadeh A, Bahredar MJ, Moeini SR. Knowledge and attitudes towards attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among elementary school teachers. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63:84-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Perold M, Louw C, Kleynhans S. Primary school teachers' knowledge and misperceptions of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). South Afr J Educ 2010;30:457-73.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Nur N, Kavakc O. Elementary school teachers' knowledge and attitudes related to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Health Med 2010;2:350-5.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Sayal K, Taylor E. Detection of child mental health disorders by general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 2004;54:348-52.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Sayal K, Tischler V, Coope C, Robotham S, Ashworth M, Day C, et al. Parental help-seeking in primary care for child and adolescent mental health concerns: Qualitative study. Br J Psychiatry 2010;197:476-81.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Sitholey P, Agarwal V, Chamoli S. A preliminary study of factors affecting adherence to medication in clinic children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Indian J Psychiatry 2011;53:41-4.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Understanding parental causal explanations and help seeking in attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: perspectives from a developing Asian nation
Ruchita Shah,Akhilesh Sharma,Nidhi Chauhan,Soumya Jhanda,Sandeep Grover
Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1420    
    Printed55    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded183    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

Advertise | Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Disclaimer
Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 05th September, 2010