Journal of Family & Community Medicine
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 
 

Users Online: 1061 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

 

 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 184-189  

The use of school teachers to promote oral hygiene in some secondary school students at Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India: A short term prospective pilot study


1 Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, India
2 Department of Orthodontics, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal, India
3 Department of Pedodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India
4 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Jaipur Dental College, Dhand, Amer Tehsil, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication13-Oct-2012

Correspondence Address:
Byalakere R Chandrashekar
Department of Public Health Dentistry, People's Dental Academy, Bhanpur, Bhopal- 462 037
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2230-8229.102319

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Study design : It was a short term prospective pilot study on a group of 116 secondary school students. Objectives: To assess the feasibility of using the services of school teachers to promote oral hygiene in secondary school students and compare the effectiveness of dental health education (DHE) offered by school teachers on a fortnightly basis with what is offered by dental professionals at three- monthly intervals. Materials and Methods: Six secondary schools were randomly selected. The base-line Oral Hygiene Index simplified (OHI-S) and Plaque index (PI) scores for all the students were recorded. The teachers were trained on dental health facts. The six schools were divided into three groups of two schools with different intervention techniques: Group 1- Schools given no health education, Group 2 - Schools given health education by their school teachers on a fortnightly basis together with simple screening for deposits of gross calculus , Group 3 - Schools which were given health education by dental professionals at intervals of three months without any screening. Grade nine students were selected for pre and post intervention evaluation. The second examination was done six months following the intervention to find out the OHI-S and Plaque index scores. The examination was done by three trained and calibrated dentists. Data analysis was done with SPSS 16 with relevant statistical tests. Results: The mean OHI-S and PI scores were significantly less in group 2 and there was a statistically significant difference between the baseline OHI - S, PI score and the scores after six months in all the three groups. Conclusion: The concept of utilizing the teachers for frequent DHE and screening for any gross deposits of food debris and calculus is feasible. Also frequent DHE by teachers was more effective than the infrequent DHE by the professionals.

Keywords: Dental health education, oral hygiene index-simplified, oral health promotion, plaque index, prospective study.


How to cite this article:
Chandrashekar BR, Suma S, Kiran K, Manjunath BC. The use of school teachers to promote oral hygiene in some secondary school students at Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India: A short term prospective pilot study. J Fam Community Med 2012;19:184-9

How to cite this URL:
Chandrashekar BR, Suma S, Kiran K, Manjunath BC. The use of school teachers to promote oral hygiene in some secondary school students at Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India: A short term prospective pilot study. J Fam Community Med [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 15];19:184-9. Available from: http://www.jfcmonline.com/text.asp?2012/19/3/184/102319


   Introduction Top


Health is a state of complete physical, social and mental well-being, but not merely the absence of disease or infirmity (W H O definition). [1] Within the context of health promotion, health has been considered less as an abstract state but rather as a means to an end. This can be expressed in functional terms as a resource which permits people to lead individual, social and economically productive lives. [2] Health is a resource for everyday life and may be viewed as a fundamental human right. Social responsibility for health is reflected by decision makers in both public and private sectors in their pursuit of policies and practices which promote and protect health. [3]

In India, students aged less than 18 years constitute about 40% of the total population. The gross enrollment of students into primary and upper classes in the year 2001 was 95.7% and 58.6% respectively. [4] These students in schools are relatively easily accessible, compared to any other population groups for many health promotion programs. In the country, there are few organized school health programs, through which a major section of the population can be reached and the lifestyle changes effected. School health programs have proven effective in promoting health in many developed countries. [5],[6] The New Zealand school dental nurse program implemented in the early part of the twentieth century to combat the oral health problems of the school students in that country, is one such that reflects the benefits of organized school dental programs. [7] Though oral health is an integral part of general health, it has not received any significant consideration in national health policies or in the planning of national health programs in many developing countries. Students who suffer from poor oral health are 12 times more likely to have more restricted days, miss school than those who do not. [8] More than 50 million school hours are lost annually as a result of oral diseases. [9] Though a National Health Policy for India has been drafted, no thought is being given to the national oral health policy at present. This indicates that the policy makers are neglectful of oral health, and its promotion is not being given the necessary attention in our country. Policy makers have to be made aware that oral health is fundamental to general health and well-being. A healthy mouth enables an individual to speak, eat and socialize without the feeling of any discomfort or embarrassment. [10] Schools provide a platform for the promotion of health and oral health not only for the students, but also for the staff, families, and members of the community as a whole. [11] Pain and tooth loss resulting from oral diseases adversely affect appearance, nutritional intake, quality of life, growth and development of students. Oral diseases such as dental caries and gingival diseases affect about 80% of the school students worldwide. [12],[13],[14] The prevalence of dental caries in students aged 12 and 15 years in India was 52.5% and 61.4% respectively. The prevalence of periodontal disease in 12 year- old students was 55.4%. [15]

The cost of treating dental caries alone can overwhelm a country's health care expenditure for students. [16] At the same time the cost of the neglect of these diseases is also high because of the personal, financial and social impact. [17] The approach suitable for the majority of the developing nations is a focus on prevention. Many students, their parents as well as teachers and policy makers are unaware that oral diseases can be prevented by simple self- controlled oral hygiene practices. [18],[19],[20],[21] The lack of organized school health programs, the dearth of published literature that demonstrates the effectiveness of school- based dental health programs and the lack of means to implement schemes such as school dental nurse program in India, prompted us to assess the feasibility of utilizing the services of school teachers in the promotion of oral hygiene among secondary school students. The study compared the effectiveness of dental health education (DHE) offered by school teachers along with screening for gross deposits of food debris and calculus at fortnightly intervals with the DHE offered by dental professionals at three- monthly intervals with no screening for gross deposits of debris and calculus.


   Materials and Methods Top


This was a short- term prospective study done over a period of six months from January to June 2009. The study was planned as a pilot study to check the feasibility of utilizing the school teachers in oral health care programs for school students. The ethical clearance was obtained by the institutional ethics committee, Kamineni institute of dental sciences, Andhra Pradesh. Six secondary schools with no history of any DHE programs were randomly selected from the list of 69 Government schools in Hyderabad. The list of teachers in these schools was collected. The study protocol was explained to the teachers and their consent was obtained. The schedule for training the teachers was prepared in consultation with the head masters of the selected schools and the district education officer. A brochure containing photographs of diseased gingival tissues with gross calculus deposits, debris, brushing and flossing techniques, the operator's position for clinical examination of the students on foldable chair in natural daylight, the retraction of the cheek using the disposable plastic spoons was prepared by the investigators. A total of 32 school teachers were trained over a period of one week by one of investigators. The contents of the brochure were thoroughly explained to the teachers and a practical demonstration of brushing and flossing techniques, how to identify gross calculus deposits, and food debris was given in one of the schools using ten patients identified with continuous heavy bands of sub- gingival calculus. Each of the teachers was given a copy of the brochure prepared by the investigators on oral health.

The students in these schools were given health education once by the investigators after the training of the teachers. The preliminary examination was done by three trained and calibrated dentists to determine the level of oral hygiene among the students. The training and calibration of investigators in the application of oral hygiene index-simplified (OHI-S) and plaque index (PI) was done on a group of twenty patients. The method of examination, the teeth to be examined, the criteria for scoring in the indices were explained to the investigators by an expert public health dentist. The first investigator examined twenty selected students and recorded the OHI-S and PI on a data collection sheet. The two other dentists completed the examination in the same manner. The scores given by the three examiners for oral hygiene and plaque for the patients were compared to determine the inter- examiner agreement, which was found to be 91% and 88% respectively. A data collection form containing the scoring charts for Greene and Vermillion OHI-S [22] and Sillness and Loe PI [23] was used to collect the information on the status of oral hygiene . Though health education was offered to all the students, only those in the nineth grade were considered for follow up. Only 20 students (10 males and 10 females) from each of the six schools were selected using stratified random sampling. Students with gross dental defects, deleterious oral habits, and those undergoing orthodontic treatment were not considered for the study. Overall, the data from 120 randomly selected students was considered for final analysis. These students were given identification numbers serially starting from the first to the sixth school. This was done for easy identification of the students even when all of them were pooled together for examination enabling us to blind the investigators on the group allocation of the students. For all these students, scaling and polishing was done after the preliminary recording of oral hygiene status, in order to reduce the OHI-S and PI scores to near zero.

After this, six schools were divided into three groups of two each with three different interventions. Group 1; had no further health education by the teachers or by the investigators after the initial health education. Group 2; for this group the headmasters were requested to allot a one- hour slot every fortnight, for the trained teachers to talk to the students about the importance of oral health, demonstrate the brushing technique and examine the students for any gross deposits of calculus and food debris. Group 3; the investigators themselves undertook the task of DHE at three months' interval with no oral examination at these times. The DHE offered by most of the dental institutions in India as part of school dental programs involves only infrequent health education sessions by dental graduates with no subsequent follow up or oral examination due to a lack of trained dental manpower. The deliberate difference in the intervention methods provided an opportunity to compare the effectiveness of infrequent DHE programs offered by qualified dentists without follow- up examinations (method commonly practiced) with what the school teachers offered as part of their curriculum on a regular basis with screening for gross deposits of calculus (an innovative concept not previously done).

The second examination for the status of oral hygiene was done by the same investigators after six months using the same protocol, questionnaire and data collection form. In the second examination, all the students were instructed to come in their own clothes (not in school uniform) and pooled together in an auditorium. The students with no identification were examined by the investigators. After the completion of the data collection sheet, the identity numbers were entered by a group of three teachers. This was done to avoid an investigator bias (blinding). The difference in the oral hygiene status in the three groups was determined as an indirect estimate of the change in the oral hygiene behavior of the students following health education programs. An autoclaved set of instruments was used to record OHI-S and PI of the students. The data analysis was done using SPSS version 16. The mean OHI-S scores and PI scores between the preliminary examination and the examination after six months in each group was compared using paired t-test and that between different groups using one-way ANOVA. Wherever ANOVA yielded significant results, Tukey's post hoc test was done for pair- wise comparisons. The statistical significance was fixed at 0.05.


   Results Top


Among 120 school students selected, three students from the first group and one from the second dropped out because of a change of school. The final analysis, therefore, included 116 students (58 girls and 58 boys) and the dropout rate was 3.3% [Table 1].
Table 1: Gender distribution of the study participants in different groups

Click here to view


Mean OHI-S and PI scores between the three groups at baseline examination

The mean baseline OHI-S score for the study population was 3.66 ± 0.82 (Mean ± SD), suggesting a poor oral hygiene status. The mean PI score was 2.28 ± 0.51. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean OHI-S score and PI scores among the students in three groups at baseline (OHI- S: P < 0.478, PI: P < 0.215, [Table 2]). This finding was true even of the comparison done of male and female students separately [Table 2].
Table 2: Baseline comparison of mean OHI-S and PI scores between three groups

Click here to view


Mean OHI-S and PI scores between the three groups, six months following the intervention

The mean OHI-S score for the study population in the second examination was 2.28 ± 1.39 (Mean ± SD), suggesting that the status of oral hygiene was fair . The OHI - S score was highest in the first group (3.21 ± 0.95), which suggested poor oral hygiene, followed by group 3 (2.85 ± 0.97) suggesting fair oral hygiene. The lowest score (0.82 ± 0.41) suggesting good oral hygiene was in group 2. The difference in the mean OHI-S score among the students in the three groups was statistically significant (P < 0.0001, [Table 3]). Tukey's post hoc comparison revealed a significant difference between group 1 and group 2, as well between group 2 and group 3 with no significant difference between group 1 and group 3 [Table 3]. The overall mean PI score for the study population was 0.84 ± 0.66. The score was lowest in group 2 (0.15 ± 0.36). The scores in group 1 and 3 were 1.16 ± 0.34 and 1.2 ± 0.56 respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001, [Table 3]).
Table 3: Comparison of Mean OHI-S and PI scores between groups, six months following the intervention in the second and third groups but no intervention in the first

Click here to view


Pre and Post intervention mean OHI - S and PI scores in three groups

There was a significant difference in the mean OHI-S and PI scores in the second examination in three groups. The students in group 2 showed a greater improvement in the status of oral hygiene than the students in the other two groups. The reduction in the mean OHI- S and PI score compared to the baseline scores in this group was 2.97, 2.08 respectively [Table 4].
Table 4: Comparison of pre-intervention and post-intervention mean OHI - S and PI scores in the three groups

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The study found a significant difference in the mean OHI-S and PI scores in the second examination of three groups. The significant improvement in oral hygiene among students in group 2 clearly demonstrates that frequent health education by teachers brings about a desired change in the oral hygiene behavior of the students. The personal evaluation by teachers might have indirectly motivated the students to perform better. The lack of difference between group 1 and 3 with respect to OHI- S score and PI reveals that the infrequent DHE, though offered by a professional (which is a common practice by most dental institutions) may not bring about the the degree of change in the oral hygiene behavior observed when the same is delivered frequently by their teachers, whom they respect and have regard for. Moreover, the fact that a teacher may assess the child's performance every fortnight and congratulate the child with best oral hygiene performance, is in itself an encouragement for the child to improve his/her oral hygiene practices. A study by Shenoy RP and Sequeira PS [24] found that the reinforcement through repeated DHE sessions, at three weeks' interval in the intervention schools resulted in a significant improvement in the knowledge of oral health, practices and reduction in the PI scores. The schools with frequent exposure to DHE programs scored better in all aspects compared to schools with less frequent exposures. The results of our study correspond with the findings of others. [25],[26] The significant decrease in the OHI - S and PI scores in the second examination than the baseline scores in all three groups indicates that DHE by the professionals might have definitely improved the oral health knowledge of the students with a significant short -term improvement in the oral hygiene behavior, but the more dramatic change in group 2 stresses the need for more frequent health education and periodic screening to reinforce what has been previously learnt. A study by Goel P et al[27] to assess the relative improvement in the knowledge achieved after imparting DHE to school students of various socioeconomic groups and the long-term effectiveness of conventional (one-time) lecture technique revealed that the DHE program was effective in improving the knowledge levels of most students. However, with the reversion of scores to pre-intervention levels after 1 year, the authors concluded that the single-lecture technique appears to be inadequate and stressed that it was important to reinforce knowledge in health education to bring about a long term change in the practices of oral hygiene. Our findings correspond with the conclusion of the above -mentioned study and others. [28],[29]

Since our study was a pilot project to check the feasibility of utilizing school teachers in programs aimed at promoting good oral hygiene behavior in school students, the second assessment was made at the end of six months though the teachers were requested to continue with health education sessions. The significant change in oral hygiene behaviors may have been a short-lived improvement. Scaling and polishing of the teeth of the study participants after the preliminary examinations might have contributed to the significant reduction in the OHI- S and PI scores in the second examination (calculus accumulation in 6 months) compared to that in the baseline examination, which is the result of a lifetime accumulation of calculus. However, by scaling and polishing the teeth of all the study participants, we were able to appreciate better the effects of the three different intervention methods. The results were very promising but further long term trials are required to validate these results bearing in mind the limitations of the study.


   Conclusions Top


There is a pressing need for the promotion of oral health throughout the school system in India and other developing countries. The concept of using school teachers for frequent DHE and screening for any gross deposits of food debris and calculus is definitely feasible as well as more effective than the infrequent DHE by the professionals. Developing countries like India, that lack organized school dental health programs, oral health policy, trained dental manpower and funds for such programs involving trained professionals can afford to train the teachers on a short term basis. The DHE by school teachers can be organized frequently in the regular school hours without disturbing the curriculum. This would facilitate a change in the oral hygiene behavior of the secondary school students, the ideal age for such a change in lifestyle practices. It is imperative for the public health authorities and health professionals to provide sustainable support such as funding, technical assistance and/or the learning aids to promote the effective utilization of school teachers. The dentists in the primary health centers (PHC) throughout the country may be given the responsibility of training teachers in the schools which come under their PHCs. The day assigned for teachers' monthly meeting may be utilized for these training programs and the continuous assessment of the progress of the program . The education department may assume the responsibility of printing the requisite materials as part of the school curriculum. The coordinated efforts of health and education departments along with active involvement of non governmental organizations and local civil societies is what is required at present in most developing countries to promote health and oral health among school students.

 
   References Top

1.Emson HE. Health, disease and illness: Matters for definition. CMAJ 1987;136:811-3.   Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva: WHO; 1986.   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.World Health Organization. The Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century. Geneva: WHO; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Gross Enrolment Ratios in Primary and Upper Primary Schools. Selected Educational Statistics, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Infochange education. News and analysis on social justice and developmental issues in India. Available from http://infochangeindia.org/education/statistics/gross-enrolment-ratios-in-primary-and-upper-primary-schools.html [Last cited on 2011 Aug 25].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Swart D, Reddy P. Establishing networks for health promoting schools in South Africa. J Sch Health 1999;69:47-50.   Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Wells J, Barlow J, Stewart-Brown S. A systematic review of universal approaches to mental health promotion in schools. Health Educ J 2003;103:197-220.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Nash DA, Friedman JW, Kardos TB, Kardose RL, Schwarz E, Satur J, et al. Dental therapists: A global perspective. Int Dent J 2008;58:61-70.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.US General accounting offices. Oral health: Dental disease is a chronic problem among low income populations. Washington, DC. Report to Congressional Requesters: 2000.   Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Gift HC, Reisine ST, Larach DC. The social impact of dental problems and visits. Am J Pub Health 1992;82:1663-8.   Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Kwan SY, Petersen PE, Pine CM, Borutta A. Health promoting schools: An opportunity for oral health promotion. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:677-85.   Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.World Health Organization. Status of school health. Report of the school health working group and WHO expert committee on comprehensive school health education and promotion. Geneva: WHO; 1999.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.World Health Organization. World oral health report 2003. Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21 century - the approach of the WHO global oral health program. Geneva: WHO; 2003.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.World Health Organization. Global oral data bank. Geneva: WHO; 2004.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.World Health Organization. Oral health promotion: An essential element of health promoting school. WHO information series on school health. Document 11. Geneva: WHO; 2003.   Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Bali RK, Mathur VB, Talwar PP, Chanana HB. National oral health survey and fluoride mapping 2002-2003, India. Dental Council of India, New Delhi, 2004. Available from: http://www.iaphd.org/statesurvey/summary.pdf [Last cited on 2011 Aug 25].   Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Yee R, Shieham A. The burden of restorative dental treatment for students in third world countries. Int Dent J 2002;52:1-9.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Mouradian WE, Wehr E, Crall JJ. Disparities in students′s oral health and access to dental care. J Am Med Assoc 2000;284:2625-31.   Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Rajab LD, Petersen PE, Bakaeen G, Hamdan MA. Oral health behavior of school students and parents in Jordan. Int J Pediatr Dent 2002;12:168-76.   Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Petersen PE, Danila I, Samoila A. Oral health behavior, knowledge and attitudes of students, mothers and school teachers in Romania in 1993. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:363-8.   Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.Petersen PE, Zhou E. Dental caries and oral health behavior situation of students, mothers and school teachers in Wuhan, People′s Republic of China. Int Dent J 1995;48:210-6.   Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Al-Tamimi, Petersen PE. Oral health situation of school students, mothers and school teachers in Saudi Arabia. Int Dent J 1998;48:180- 6.   Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Greene JC, Vermillion. Oral hygiene index simplified/OHI- S. Oral Health Database 1964. Available from: http://www.mah.se/CAPP/Methods-and-Indices/Oral-Hygiene-Indices/Simplified-Oral-Hygiene-Index--OHI-S/ [Last cited on 2011 Aug 25].  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:122-35.   Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Shenoy RP, Sequiera PS. Effectiveness of a school dental education program in improving oral health knowledge and oral hygiene practices and status of 12 to 13 year old students. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:253-9.   Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
25.Yazdani R, Vehkalahti MM, Nouri M, Murtomaa H. School-based education to improve oral cleanliness and gingival health in adolescents in Tehran, Iran. Int J Paediatr Dent 2009;19:274-81.   Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.Redmond CA, Blinkhorn FA, Kay EJ, Davies RM, Worthington HV, Blinkhorn AS. A cluster randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a school-based dental health education program for adolescents. J Public Health Dent 1999;59:12-7.   Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.Goel P, Sehgal M, Mittal R. Evaluating the effectiveness of school-based dental health education program among students of different socioeconomic groups. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005;23:131-3.   Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
28.Worthington HV, Fiona AH. A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dental Health Education Program for 10-year-old students. J Public Health Dent 2001;61:22-7.   Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Hartono SW, Herawati T, Van Palenstein HW. Implementation of a community oral health programme in Cimareme, Bandung. J Dent Res 1997;76:90.  Back to cited text no. 29
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 6-7 YAS OKUL ÇOCUKLARININ AGIZ SAGLIGI EGITIMINDE DIS HEKIMLERI ILE OKUL ÖGRETMENLERININ ETKINLIGININ KARSILASTIRILMASI
Berna KUTER,Burcu KANMAZ
Atatürk Üniversitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 WhatsApp platform as an dental and oral health online communication forum for dentist, nurse, and elementary teachers
Titiek Berniyanti,Taufan Bramantoro,Gilang Rasuna,Achmad Zamzam,AryoDwipo Kusumo,Aulia Ramadhani
Journal of International Oral Health. 2019; 11(4): 213
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Challenges Implementing Oral Health Promotion at Schools: Perspectives of Teachers and Health Managers
M. Reddy
Early Childhood Education Journal. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Oral Health Knowledge, Attitude, and Approaches of Pre-Primary and Primary School Teachers in Mumbai, India
Ankita Mota,Kunal C. Oswal,Dipti A. Sajnani,Anand K. Sajnani
Scientifica. 2016; 2016: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Oral hygiene among schoolchildren military insured after the training about oral hygiene and motivation
Margareta Lekic,Zlata Brkic,Tamara Zurovac,Anita Šegvic-Rakita
Zdravstvena zastita. 2014; 43(6): 45
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Oral health survey and oral health questionnaire for high school students in Tibet, China
Rui Hou,Yong Mi,Quanhong Xu,Fang Wu,Yuanyuan Ma,Peng Xue,Gao Xiao,Yan Zhang,Yinhua Wei,Wenbing Yang
Head & Face Medicine. 2014; 10(1): 17
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3152    
    Printed92    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded529    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal

Advertise | Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Disclaimer
© Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 05th September, 2010