Journal of Family & Community Medicine
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 
 

Users Online: 1150 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

 

 Table of Contents 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 127-131  

Ovarian dysgerminoma in two sisters


P.O. Box 40053, Al-Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication16-Jun-2012

Correspondence Address:
Bander F Aldhafery
P.O. Box 40053, Al-Khobar 31952
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 23012179

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Although rare, dysgerminomas are important irrespective of incidence because they affect women of reproductive age (i.e., <45 years). Dysgerminomas make up two thirds of all malignant ovarian neoplasms in women younger than 20 years. All dysgerminomas are considered malignant, but only one third of dysgerminomas behave aggressively. Their exact etiology has not been determined. Few reports are found in the review of the literature on the incidence of dysgerminoma and other germ cell tumors in families. Some of these reports focus on the genetic abnormalities associated with germ cell tumor and the responsible gene. Two cases of dysgerminomas diagnosed in two sisters aged 14 and 19 years old are presented here with their radiological studies.

Keywords: Dysgerminoma, Germ Cell Tumor,Familial incidence,Imaging.


How to cite this article:
Aldhafery BF. Ovarian dysgerminoma in two sisters. J Fam Community Med 2008;15:127-31

How to cite this URL:
Aldhafery BF. Ovarian dysgerminoma in two sisters. J Fam Community Med [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Dec 6];15:127-31. Available from: http://www.jfcmonline.com/text.asp?2008/15/3/127/97046


   Introduction Top


Ovarian cancer in the pediatric age group is rare. The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries reported in the period from 1992 to 1997 more than 1.6 million females with the diagnosis of cancer. Of these, 67,746 were ovarian cancers, 1563 (or 2.3%) of which occurred in patients younger than 25. Close to 50% (780 cases) were reported in women aged 20 to 24, 481 cases in the 15- to 19-year-old group, and 302 cases in the neonates to the 14-year-old group. [1]

The three major types of ovarian tumors are epithelial, sex cord, and germ cell. Epithelial cell tumors represent the majority of all ovarian neoplasms (82%).Conversely, germ cell tumors

(GCTs) are rare, comprising approximately 20% of all ovarian tumors, both benign and malignant. Approximately 3-5% of ovarian GCTs are malignant. The most commonly occurring GCT is the dysgerminoma, which accounts for only 1-5% of all ovarian cancers. [2]-[6]

In the literature search using Pubmed, Midline search and Google, some reports on the incidence of dysgerminoma in families were found. However, the exact incidence is still unknown. I am presenting two cases of dysgerminomas diagnosed in two sisters aged 14 and 19 years.


   Case Report Top


The first patient is a 14-year-old Saudi single female who presented at the Emergency Department with a prolonged history of pelvic and lower abdominal swelling associated with a dull pelvic pain and anorexia.

Physical examination revealed huge abdomenopelvic mass with mild tenderness over pelvis and lower abdomen. On inspection, the external genitalia were found to be normal. The patient was referred for ultrasound examination and the study (Not Shown) revealed a large mass measuring 12x16 cm arising from the right adnexa with upward extension into the abdomen. It was predominantly solid with central anechoic area due to central necrosis. The uterus and urinary bladder were compressed and displaced. Both ovaries were not visualized. Fluid was seen within cul-de-sac. Color doppler examination showed increased vascularity of the mass. Ultrasound examination of the abdomen showed bilateral dilatation of pelvicalyceal system and upper ureters consistent with bilateral hydrouretro-nephrosis.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis [Figure 1] showed a large encapsulated mass arising from right adnexa with upward extension into abdominal cavity displacing and compressing both uterus and urinary bladder anteriorly and inferiorly. The mass was non-homogeneous with predominantly intermediate signal intensity in proton density images, and contained multiple cystic spaces representing previous tumor hemorrhage. No calcification or fatty component were identified. No enlarged lymph nodes were seen within the abdomen or pelvis. There was no invasion to adjacent structures.
Figure 1 : Patient One. Two consequent saggital proton density MRI of the pelvis showing a large mass arising from adnexa with upward extension into abdominal cavity. The mass appears of intermediate signal intensity with multiple internal foci of high signal intensity. Mass effect on adjacent structures such as the uterus, urinary bladder and rectum is seen.

Click here to view


Intravenous urography [Figure 2] showed bilateral laterally displaced and dilated ureters with bilateral hydronephrosis.
Figure 2 : Patient One. Single film of IVP series showing lateral deviation of both pelvic ureters by a large pelvic mass with bilateral hydronephrosis.

Click here to view


The patient was operated on and the treatment consisted of simple right salpingo-oophorectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. No metastasis to adjacent structures was identified during surgery. The patient had an uncomplicated post-operative course. Examination of the surgical specimen revealed pure dysgerminoma (stage one A) arising from the right ovary.

The follow-up of thirty months confirmed that the patient was in good health with normal ultrasound and laboratory results.

Two years later, her sister presented at the age of 19 with lower abdominal mass, mild pain and dysmenorrhea. Physical examination showed a palpable mass in the lower abdomen and pelvis with mild tenderness. The patient was referred to the Radiology Department where ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT) scan [Figure 3] and [Figure 4] and MRI were done. The imaging features of the mass were almost the same as in the first patient. The patient was operated on and the mass was found to have arisen from the left ovary with no macroscopic invasion of surrounding structures. A simple left salpingo-oophrectomy was done followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. There has been no follow-up till date.
Figure 3 : Patient Two. Two consequent contrast enhanced axial CT scan images of the pelvis showing irregular heterogeneously enhancing mass arising from left adnexa with upward extension. The uterus is displaced by the mass to the left.

Click here to view
Figure 4 : Patient Two. Two sagittally reconstructed CT scan images showing a large mass arising from the pelvis, displacing the urinary bladder and uterus anteriorly and inferiorly. The mass appears isodense to the muscles and contains multiple areas of low densities representing cystic changes.

Click here to view



   Discussion and Conclusion Top


Malignant germ cell tumors are more frequent in young patients. The most common subtypes are dysgerminoma, immature teratoma, and endodermal sinus tumor. Dysgerminoma is an equivalent of seminoma in male patients. Patients present with a unilateral, predominantly solid mass with varying degrees of necrosis and hemorrhage. Nodal metastases are more frequent than peritoneal disease. The patients are treated with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and chemotherapy. [7],[8] Dysgerminomas are bilateral in 10-35% of cases. Five percent occur in phenotypic females with abnormal gonads. They may have a 46XY karyotype with pure gonadal dysgenesis or androgen insensitivity syndrome, or they may have a 45X, 46XY karyotype with mixed gonadal dysgenesis. [9],[10]

In patients with a known or suspected adnexal mass, ultrasound is highly accurate in the assessment of the location of the tumor (e.g., differentiation of uterine from adnexal masses) and in distinguishing between a benign and malignant adnexal lesion. The optimal use of ultrasound requires the analysis of morphologic features and doppler findings. [11],[12],[13],[14] Ovarian masses with septations greater than 3 mm, mural nodularity, and papillary projections suggest the diagnosis of malignant ovarian neoplasm. [15],[16],[17] The most significant feature is the presence of solid components within an ovarian mass, [18] Other features suggesting malignant etiology include vascular septations thicker than 3 mm, septal nodularity, and single or multiple enhancing solid components within a cystic mass. [19],[20] Necrosis within a solid lesion is also a strong indicator of malignancy. In our cases, many of these features such as solid components, central necrosis, heterogeneity, free fluid and central increased vscularity were present.

Color and pulsed doppler techniques may aid diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Central color Doppler flow within solid components of an ovarian mass has been shown to be an accurate predictor of malignancy. [18],[21],[22] Brown and colleagues [18] studied 211 adnexal masses, including 28 malignancies to determine the best discrimination between benignity and malignancy by gray-scale and doppler. A nonhyperechoic solid component within a mass, central blood flow on color doppler imaging, free intraperitoneal fluid, and septations within a mass had 93% sensitivity and 93% specificity for diagnosis of malignancy.

In a setting of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses, MR imaging is used as a problem-solving tool. The main advantage of MR imaging is that it can provide tissue characterization based on signal properties. [23]

For adequate evaluation of adnexal masses on MR imaging, T1-weighted and T2- weighted images are fundamental in the delineation of pelvic anatomy and tumor. Fat-saturated T1-weighted images help to distinguish between fat and hemorrhage. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images help to characterize the internal architecture of cystic lesions and improve the detection of solid components. [24],[25] MR imaging has been shown to be superior to doppler ultrasound and conventional CT in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses [the estimated area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.78 for ultrasound, 0.87 for CT, and 0.91 for MR imaging]. [26] Although CT has not

traditionally been used in the characterization of an adnexal mass, studies have shown that the utility of thin-section multislice CT is equivalent to that of ultrasound. CT characterization of adnexal mass relies on the depiction of morphologic features of enhancing mural nodularity or heterogeneity and necrosis within a solid lesion. Ancillary findings, such as ascites and peritoneal carcinomatosis on ultrasound, CT, or MR imaging are strong indicators of a malignant etiology for an adnexal mass.

Several cases of families with both males and females diagnosed with germ cell cancers have been documented. The low incidence of ovarian germ cell cancers suggests that multiple occurrences in the same family may not be due to chance. Rather, it is possible that a gene that confers susceptibility to ovarian germ cell cancers, and possibly to germ cell tumors in males as well, is present in at least some of these families. [27]

The primary goal of radiologic assessment is the differentiation of malignant tumors from benign tumors, rather than determination of histologic subtype. Sometimes, it is possible, however, to suggest the histologic subtype of an epithelial neoplasm based on particular imaging features.

I would like, in conclusion, to recommend an early diagnosis. With the availability of recent imaging techniques, a full radiological investigation could be done to search for metastasis, evaluate the adjacent organs, and give an early referral to the Oncology Center since the tumor is chemo-sensitive.


   Acknowledgment Top


My sincere thanks to Dr. Fatma Almulhim, Professor of Radiology, King Faisal University, for her substantial help in the preparation of this material.

 
   References Top

1.Young JL, Wu XC, Roffers SD, Howe HL, Correa C, Weinstein R. Ovarian cancer in children and young adults in the United States, 1992-1997. Cancer 2003; 97 : 2694-700.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Educational bulletin: Ovarian Cancer. ACOG compendium of selected publications. 2000:250;667-75.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL. Female genital tract. In: Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1996: 1127-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Disaia PJ, Creasman WT. Clinical Gynecologic Oncology. Mosby-Year Book; 1997: 282-374.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC. Epithelial ovarian cancer. In: Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1992:715-81.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Isselbacher KJ, Braunwald E, Wilson JD. Principles of cancer therapy. In: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 13th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994:1826-40.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Jung SE, Rha SE, Lee JM, et al. CT and MRI findings of sex cord-stromal tumor of the ovary. AJR Am J Roentgeno 2005;185(1):207-15.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Kim SH, Kim SH. Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: common findings and unusual appearances on CT and MR. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26(5):756-61.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Gershenson DM. Update on malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Cancer 1993; 71(4 Suppl): 1581-90.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Schwartz PE, Chambers SK, Chambers JT, et al. Ovarian germ cell malignancies: the Yale University experience. Gynecol Oncol 1992;45(1): 26-31.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11. Cohen LS, Escobar PF, Scharm C, et al. Three-dimensional power doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82: 40-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Kinkel K, Hricak H, Ying Lu, et al. US characterization of ovarian masses: a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 217:803-11.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Sparac V, et al. Preoperative evaluation of pelvic tumors by Doppler and three-dimensional sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:829-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Sparac V, et al. The detection of stage I ovarian cancer by three-dimensional sonography and power Doppler. Gynecol Oncology 2003;90:(2):258-64.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Funt SA, Hann LE. Detection and characterization of adnexal masses. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40(3):591-608.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Jain KA. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: Correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 1994;191(1): 63-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Salem S, Wilson SR. Gynecologic ultrasound. In: Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, et al. ed. Diagnostic Ultrasound, 2nd edition 2005 Mosby: Philadelphia.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH, et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology 1998;208:103-10.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Funt SA, Hricak H. Ovarian malignancies. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 14(4):329-37.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Jeong YY, Outwater EK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2000; 20(5):1445-70.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Schelling M, Braun M, Kuhn W, et al. Combined transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler sonography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77: 78-86.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Coccia ME, et al. Complex pelvic mass as a target of evaluation of vessel distribution by color Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of adnexal malignancies: results of a mulitcenter European study. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21:1105-11.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Rieber A, Nussle K, Stohr I, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histological findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177(1): 123-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Halvorsen Jr.RA, Panushka C, Oakley GJ, et al. Intraperitoneal contrast material improves the CT detection of peritoneal metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157(1):37-40.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Komatsu T, Konishi I, Madai M, et al. Adnexal masses: Transvaginal US and gadolinium-enhanced MRI assessment of intratumoral structure. Radiology 1996;198:109-15.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Kurtz AB, Tsimikas JV, Tempany CM, et al. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis-report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1999; 212(1):19-27.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Stettner AR, Hartenbach EM, Schink JC, et al. American Journal of medical genetics 1999; 84(1):43-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
    Discussion and C...
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3877    
    Printed86    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded273    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Advertise | Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Disclaimer
Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 05th September, 2010