Journal of Family & Community Medicine
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 
 

Users Online: 485 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

 

 Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 25-29  

Short-term outcome of preterms in two neonatology units in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia


King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraidah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication30-Jul-2012

Correspondence Address:
Mohamed K.M. Khalil
Head of Research Unit, Medical Education and Research Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 2290, Buraidah, Al-Qassim
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 23011988

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Objective: A follow-up study, to compare the short-term outcome of preterms, in two hospitals in Al Qassim region, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: Preterms admitted in two hospitals, 47 in hospital A and 36 in hospital B, were followed from admission until one month after discharge. Preterms were compared on gestational age, birth weight, birth head circumference and length of stay. Outcome measures were weight gain per day, feeding patterns on discharge and feeding patterns one month after discharge compared with the feeding of normal infants (200 infants) at the age of 6 weeks.
Results: No difference was found between the two hospitals on admission in gestational age, mean birth weight, birth head circumference and length of stay. Mean weight gain per day was significantly higher in hospital A, 9.56 (± 19.7) gm, compared to 1.22 (± 29.47) gm in hospital B. (P=0.049). But the proportion of exclusive breast fed infants, one month after discharge was higher in hospital B, 37.5% compared to 13.2% in hospital A. (p=0.0224).
Conclusion: Our study showed that there is a clear hospital level difference in the same region, in the short-term outcome. This emphasizes that outcome should be continuously followed and that differences should be evaluated in perinatal audit procedure.

Keywords: Preterm, breastfeeding, weight, Saudi


How to cite this article:
Khalil MK, Al-Ghamdi YS, Al-Yahia OA, Subahi A, Barmada R. Short-term outcome of preterms in two neonatology units in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Community Med 2003;10:25-9

How to cite this URL:
Khalil MK, Al-Ghamdi YS, Al-Yahia OA, Subahi A, Barmada R. Short-term outcome of preterms in two neonatology units in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Community Med [serial online] 2003 [cited 2019 Nov 14];10:25-9. Available from: http://www.jfcmonline.com/text.asp?2003/10/2/25/97844


   Introduction Top


Neonatal Intensive Care has experienced tremendous growth in the past 30 years. This expansion in capacity grew out of neonatology's proven effectiveness in improving birth weight specific outcome coupled with efforts to regionalize care through a system of unit classification and maternal and newborn transport. [1],[2],[3] But availability of service is not the only problem, as the quality of service varies from one center to another. Variation in practice and outcome in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), is well known even in developed countries. [4] In Canada, there was a significant variation in the risk-adjusted mortality rates among 17 NICUs included in an evaluation. [5]

This variation in practices and outcome was observed despite Canada's universal health insurance system. [6] This has also been noticed in other countries. [7] The aim of this study is to document variation in the short-term outcome of the preterm in two hospitals in the city of Buraidah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.


   Methods Top


This follow-up study included preterms born in two neonatology units in the two hospitals (Hospital A & Hospital B) in the city of Buraidah, Qassim. Criteria for inclusion (a) Infants born at the study hospital (b) gestational age < 37 weeks. Infants with congenital anomalies were excluded. The following variables were used in the study; gestational age, birth weight, head circumference, and weight at the start of study, discharge weight, discharge feeding pattern, length of stay and feeding pattern one month after discharge. To obtain representative data, the feeding pattern was not altered during the study. For comparison, the following clinical data were used: weight gain per day during hospitalization (using digital electronics scales), length of stay, discharge feeding pattern and feeding pattern, one month later. The feeding pattern after one month was also compared with a reference sample of normal children. This reference sample (200 infants) was of normal infants attending the first immunization visit in Primary Health Care (PHC) at the age of 6 weeks, recruited from 10 PHC selected at random from Buraidah.

Statistical analysis: SPSSPC V10 was used for analysis using t-test to compare quantitative data and Chi-square test to compare qualitative data.


   Results Top


Of the 94 preterms included, 83 completed the study, 47 from Hospital A and 36 from hospital B. [Table 1] shows that the two groups of infants were comparable regarding; gestational age, birth weight, birth head circumference, weight at the start of study, discharged age and length of stay.

Weight gain per day was significantly higher in hospital A (9.564 gm/day) compared to hospital B (-1.22 gm/day). (P=0.049).
Table 1 : Comparison between Hospital A and B in Buraidah city

Click here to view


Although, no significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the feeding pattern on discharge, the proportion of exclusive breast feeding was higher in hospital B, one month after discharge, [Table 1] p=0.024

Compared to a group of normal infants (191 infants) at the age of 6 weeks, preterm infants were more likely to be on exclusive formula feeding (59.3%) than normal infants (19.9%), p=0.0001. The feeding pattern of preterm infants one month after discharge, compared to normal infants, is shown in [Table 2].
Table 2 : Feeding pattern at the age of six weeks

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Daily evaluation of body weight is standard practice in the care of preterm infants. Weight changes in the first week of life primarily reflect fluctuation of total body fluid, whereas changes beyond the second week of life seem to reflect growth in response to nutrition support. [8] Knowing that the mean length of stay in our study is two weeks after birth, weight gain in our study reflects not only growth but fluid balance. The mean weight at the start of the study was > 1800 gm for both hospitals and the discharge feeding pattern was the same, but weight gain per day and the proportion of exclusive breast fed infants after one month, were different. This may reflect a difference in the outcome due to different practices, workload, resources, efficiency or other factors, during hospitalization.

A higher proportion of exclusive breast-feeding one month after discharge cannot explain the lower daily weight gain in Hospital B, because no difference was found between the feeding patterns on discharge in the two hospitals [Table 1].

Although it is possible eventually to achieve an intrauterine weight gain 14-16 gm/kg/day in a hospitalized preterm, catch-up growth does not occur before the time of discharge. [9],[10] Published data from similar studies, showed that mean weight gain/day during the first two weeks of hospitalization, is in the range of 15-16 gm/day. [11],[12]

In Hospital B, there was a program for Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) to support breast-feeding. This was reflected in the rate for exclusive breastfeeding one month after discharge, which was significantly higher than in Hospital A (p=0.024), but comparable to normal Saudi infants at the same age [Table 2]. The effect of BFHI was also demonstrated in other studies. [13],[14]

Investigators who studied the breastfeeding patterns of low birth weight infants, (1500-2500gm) on the day of hospital discharge and 4 weeks later, found that 38% of the infants were exclusively breast fed on the day of hospital discharge and 40% of the infants were exclusively breast fed at 4 weeks. [15] Exclusive breast-feeding in normal children at 6-8 weeks, which was 40% in our study, is comparable to published data from other Saudi studies. In Riyadh city, studies showed that 32.4% and 22.1% of Saudi infants were exclusively breast-fed at 3 and 6 months respectively. The same study showed that 18.2%, 48.4% and 65% were exclusively bottle fed at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. [16] Other data showed that over half of the children had been bottle-fed with infant formula at some stage. [17]

Our study supports evidence from other studies that there is a strong and a consistent effect of LBW on infant feeding pattern. [18] Mothers of premature infants need support and advice to successfully initiate and sustain breastfeeding in the NICU setting, by expressing milk until the infant is well enough to put to breast. [19] This can be done by providing education and support, through a lactation specialist, who can facilitate breastfeeding in the NICU setting.

Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of medical care for newborn infants can be done through a coordinated program of research, education, and quality-improvement. [20] Our study showed that there is a clear hospital level difference in the same region, in the short-term outcome. This emphasizes that outcome should be continuously followed and that differences should be evaluated in a perinatal audit procedure. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of different factors such as type of practice, work load and others on the outcome of preterm. Our study supports evidence from other studies that BFHI has a positive impact on breast feeding. At the end of study, arrangements were made to combine the two units in a centralized service.


   Acknowledgment Top


This study was supported in part by Wyeth Nutritional Company.

 
   References Top

1.Goodmann DC, Fisher ES, Little GA, Stuckel TA, Chang CH. Are neonatal intensive care resources located according to the need? Regional variation in neonatologist, beds, and low birth weight. Pediatrics 2001;108(2):426-31  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Little G, Merenstein G. Towards improving the outcomes of pregnancy. 1993: perinatal regionalization revisited. Pediatrics 1993;92: 611-2  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Hack M, Klein N, Taylor H. Long-term developmental outcomes of low birth weight infants. Future Child 1995;5:176-96  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Horbar JD. The Vermonth Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology. Pediatrics 1999;103(1):350-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Sankaran K, Chein LY, Walker R, Seshia M, Ohlsson A. Canadian Neonatal Network. Variation in mortality rates among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. CMAJ 2002;166(2):173-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Lee SK, McMillan DD, Ohlsson A, et al. Variations in practice and outcomes in the Canadian NICU network: 1996-1997. Pediatrics 2000;106(5):1070-9  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Tommiska V, Heinonen K, Ikonen S, et al. A national short-term follow-up study of extremely low birth weight infants born in Finland in 1996-1997. Pediatrics 2001;107(1):E2.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Bauer K, Bovermann G, Roithmaier A, et al. Body composition, nutrition, and fluid balance during the first two weeks of life in preterm neonates weighing less than 1500 grams. J Pediatr 1991;118:615-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Greer FR. Feeding the preterm infants after hospital discharge. Pediatric Annals 2001;30(11):658.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB More L, Kogan MA. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:163-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Barton AJ, Danek G, Owen B. Clinical and economic outcomes of infants receiving milk in the NICU. Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses 2001;6(1):5-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Kennedy KA, Tyson JE Chamnanvanikij S. Early versus delayed initiation of progressive enteral feedings for parenerally fed low birth weight or preterm infants. (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Iissue 2, 2002.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Cattaneo A, Buzzetti R. Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. BMJ 2001;323:1258-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Fairbank L, O'Meara S, Renfrew MJ, Woolridge M, Sowden AJ, Lister-Sharp D. A systemic review to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention to promote the initiation of breast feeding. Health Technol Assess 2000;4(25):1-171.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Hill PD, Ledbetter, RJ, Kavanaugh. KL. Breastfeeding patterns of low-birth weight infants after hospital discharge. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 1997;26:189-97.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Al-Ayed IH, Qureshi MI. Breast feeding practices in Urban Riyadh. J Trop Pediatr 1998;44(2):113-7  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Wyen AH, Spencer AJ, Szuster FS. Infant and child feeding practices: a preliminary investigation. Aust Dent J 1997;42(1):54-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Adair LS, Popkin BM. Low birth weight reduces the likehood of breast-feeding among Filipino infants. The Journal of Nutrition 1996.126(1):103.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Barton AJ, Danek G, Owens B. Clinical and economic outcomes of infants receiving breast milk in the NICU. Journal of Society of Pediatrics Nurses Mar 2001;6(1):5-10.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Horbar JD, Rogowski J, Plsek P, et al. Collaborative quality improvement for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 2001;107(1):14-22.  Back to cited text no. 20
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1390    
    Printed62    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded129    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Advertise | Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Disclaimer
Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 05th September, 2010